How Zimbabwe prospered by practising less, not more

“I think energy on the field is more important than a few balls in the nets,” says head coach Dave Houghton

Danyal Rasool21-Oct-20222:23

Takeaways: Two-time champions WI bow out; Zimbabwe back among big boys

Zimbabwe qualified for this T20 World Cup in July, but for the past three months, coach Dave Houghton has given short shrift to the idea that they qualified for anything at all. For him, qualification meant getting through to where he feels Zimbabwe belong, in the Super 12s. He wasn’t too keen on going to Australia only to come back after playing three games.The self-serving approach might be to overplay the achievement of getting to the main round, burnishing his credentials as a coach, but at every opportunity, Houghton has chosen to underplay it. “I did say to the guys when we left home, it’s nice we qualified to get here, but that’s not our main objective,” he said after Zimbabwe’s beat Scotland to make the Super 12s. “Our main objective is to get through and then cause as much damage in the next stage as we can.Related

Neighbours out to prove a point in rare World Cup clash

Dave Houghton: 'The real test for us will be to play fearless cricket against sides like India and Australia'

Brad Evans: 'We're not going to Australia to come back before main World Cup starts'

Chatara, Ervine and Raza lead Zimbabwe into Super 12s

Sikandar Raza and Zimbabwe bury ghosts of Harare 2018

“Obviously we’re over the moon. When I took over in June or so for the qualifiers in Bulawayo, the biggest and main objective was to get here. We got ahead and won five of those games, and they were as pressurised as any game because each game was like a cup final. So we had some sort of experience of playing a game with as much on it as this one is like today.”Zimbabwe had left themselves with no room for error after a disappointing batting performance saw them slump to defeat against West Indies. In that game, Houghton’s preference for ultra-aggression had perhaps played a part in the defeat, with Zimbabwe going after a quality West Indian bowling attack even when the required rate meant they could have adopted a more sedate approach. A predisposition for caution in this crunch game might only have been natural, but Houghton has drilled his side too well to let them fall back into those old habits.”Going into today’s game, I wanted us to play the same way,” he said. “I’m excited by the fact our players will continue to do it. Win or lose in a cut-throat game like today, we could be going home at 6 tomorrow morning, or staying in the hotel overnight and preparing for the next round.”It was a tough game, and our guys are happy to keep playing that way, and I want us to keep playing that way. It’s the only way we’ll improve.”There has been a sea change in results and the morale in the Zimbabwean camp since Houghton took over about four months ago. But Houghton doesn’t believe himself to be a tactical mastermind who overhauled the way Zimbabwe played cricket, somewhat quaintly admitting he “doesn’t really know the answer to what he’s brought to the team”.”The only thing I’ve done to the guys is saying ‘you have the freedom to play, and there will be no repercussions if you make mistakes’. One other thing I’ve done is changed our practising schedules. The Zimbabwean guys have worked really hard to get techniques to compete at this level, but they’ll over-practise. If I leave them to their own devices, they’ll practice from 8am to 4pm every day of the week. The problem with that is that by day two, the practising becomes mundane and boring and nobody is actually going forward.”So I’ve really cut back on our practices. Our practices are a bit shorter and with a bit more quality, and there are days where I won’t let them practise at all because I think energy on the field is more important than a few balls in the nets.”

“The guys have worked really hard to get techniques to compete at this level, but they’ll over-practise. If I leave them to their own devices, they’ll practice from 8am to 4pm every day of the week. So I’ve really cut back on our practices”

Houghton has also repeatedly offered a straight bat to any invitations to criticise the previous coach Lalchand Rajput or his setup, even if the difference since his arrival has been like chalk and cheese. But in his own taciturn way, he did offer suggestions as to why Zimbabwe found themselves in such a deep malaise earlier this year, hinting there were perhaps “too many repercussions, a bit of over-analysis and a bit of over-practising”. He also said that Zimbabwe didn’t really have too many team talks under him. It is something fast bowler Brad Evans also told ESPNcricinfo earlier, saying a meeting that lasted ten minutes under him would be considered unduly long.”I don’t think it was too difficult,” Houghton said. “Nobody wants to be unhappy. So to get them to go from unhappy to happy is not that difficult at all. Once they realised that I’m not going to be a person who’s going to be standing there pointing fingers and shouting at them all day, I think immediately there was a change in attitude.”The last time Houghton was Zimbabwe’s coach at a World Cup was at the ODI edition in 1999. On that occasion, too, Zimbabwe qualified for the second round and finished fifth, their best performance at a World Cup. It included wins against South Africa and India in the first round.It’s perhaps tempting to get carried away, but Houghton has the experience to understand the step-up in the quality his side is about to face. “I’m happy to talk about our ambitions, but I don’t want to be unrealistic,” he said. “Obviously everybody would sit here and say we want to win it. We want to cause some damage. If we could take home a couple of big scalps as well, that would be great.”Just as he is about to leave, though, there is a mischievous little glint in his eye and the shadow of a smile. “If we could get into the semi-finals, even better.”Houghton then gets up and makes his way out to join his players in the celebrations. He is a happy man in charge of a happy team. Despite Zimbabwe Cricket’s financial condition, you cannot put a price on that.

Deepak Chahar is back, World Cup or no World Cup

His comeback may have come too late for a realistic chance of selection, but his 3 for 27 showed why he remains a compelling option

Sidharth Monga18-Aug-20222:32

Chahar: ‘I’m continuing from where I left off before the injury’

India’s head coach Rahul Dravid was the India A coach before he took up the job. During his stint, he coached most of the players who play for India now. One of the players he was highly impressed with was Deepak Chahar. It wasn’t just the skills. Chahar has had to deal with more than a few injuries, but he has always bounced back. Dravid says that whenever Chahar played for India A, it was an education for the other fast bowlers in the group, in how professional, deliberate and particular he was with how he looked after his body.Chahar’s ability to come back from injury has been tested at a particularly delicate time in his career. He was building up solid momentum towards his first World Cup appearance when he tore his quadriceps during a T20I in February this year. It turned out be his last competitive game of cricket before his match-winning return against Zimbabwe on Thursday.Related

  • High stakes for KL Rahul and Deepak Chahar in Zimbabwe

  • Chahar, Dhawan, Gill lead India's rout of Zimbabwe

At the time of his injury, Chahar was a frontrunner for the new-ball role in India’s T20 side. He also brought value with the bat down the order. He had worked on his death-bowling skills too, and had proved it when playing for Chennai Super Kings. While rehabbing following the quadriceps tear, Chahar did his back in, which kept him out of the IPL and the tours of England and the West Indies.Had Chahar been ready for the five T20Is against the West Indies, he could have presented a case for a World Cup spot, but now that he is not part of the Asia Cup squad, it is perhaps believed that his body has recovered a touch too late.It pays to be professional and philosophical about these things and do the best you can when you get whatever games you get. Chahar was not happy with the landing area when he began his new-ball spell, but his attention to detail was apparent. He was not taking any chances on his comeback. By over two, he felt comfortable and was on the money with a new ball that surprisingly swung for all seven overs of his first spell.In these moments, it’s not about selection for World Cups but enjoying the rare day when the conditions are helping you.Tadiwanashe Marumani sways away from a Deepak Chahar bouncer•AFP via Getty Images”That [World Cup selection] is not in my hand,” Chahar said when asked if he felt he was back to where he was six-and-a-half months ago vis-à-vis the World Cup spot. “Skill-wise, though, I have worked really hard. There I can say I have probably started where I had left off. After the first over [when I had the run-up issue], rest whatever I bowled, I was happy. It was a seven-over spell, so the fitness is good.”However, Chahar did feel the pressure of having to reclaim his place in the side after the long break. “You have to make your space again in the team,” Chahar said. “Because when you are away for a long time, others come in and perform well and make their place in the side. To make your place in the side again, you have to give good performances. So that pressure is always there on a returning player. I had the same expectation that I will do well when I come back because that is all a player has in his hand.”Other than that, Chahal will be the first one to say his outing in Harare – late swing each way, full attacking lengths, early wickets – didn’t tell viewers anything they didn’t know about Chahar. “My plan is always simple,” Chahar said. “When the ball is swinging, try to bowl fuller length and take as many wickets as possible. When the ball is not swinging, then there is a Plan B or Plan C. Today when I bowled, it swung for six-seven overs, so I had a simple plan: bowl full, mix the swing and confuse the batsmen.”The question really is not about Chahar’s skill or his utility when it comes to World Cup selection. It’s about his fitness – which he was happy with having bowled 10 overs in the practice matches he played before returning, and then this seven-over spell – and the timing of his return. Do the selectors think it is too late to disrupt a combination that they might have settled on before Chahar’s return?As Chahar said, that is not in his hands. So let’s just enjoy the early swing and look forward to Plans B and C for the rest of this series.

'Let's play Bazball!' – Ranking England's 11 Tests under Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes

From a setback at Lord’s to the craziness of Rawalpindi, we compare and contrast the Baz-approved method

Andrew Miller21-Feb-2023Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum came together as England’s new captain-coach partnership at the start of the last English summer, with the team in the doldrums having won one of their previous 17 Tests dating back to the previous spring. They’ve now been in harness for nine months and 11 matches, in which time they have won ten and lost one, and overseen a cultural revolution within the team’s ranks. But how have these XI performances matched up against each other, and to what degree have they epitomised the team’s ineffable mind-trick, colloquially known as “Bazball”? Here, ESPNcricinfo attempts to rank each of these performances in terms of their Bazziness* …Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum have overseen a revolution in England’s approach to Test cricket•Philip Brown/Getty Images

11. South Africa, Lord’s – Lost by an innings and 12 runs

The first and only setback of the Stokes-McCullum regime, but can it really be described as a failure of Bazball, as such? South Africa’s seam attack piled into England with such ferocity, they were scarcely given the chance to deploy their new method in the first place – hence McCullum’s apparently counter-intuitive appeal to “go harder” at the end of a meek display. On an overcast first day, England were asked to bat first and set the tempo, a whole new proposition after four remarkable run-chases, and Kagiso Rabada was primed to seize on the merest hint of reticence. England’s response with the ball was gutsy but, with 165 on the board, they were always fighting a losing cause. However, the sight of Stokes getting physical in an 18-over stint was a sign of his determination to dig the deepest when the going got tough.Ollie Robinson returned to England’s ranks with a bang against South Africa•PA Images via Getty Images

10. South Africa, Old Trafford – Won by an innings and 85 runs

Related

  • 'I just can't see him stopping' – Stokes on Anderson becoming No. 1 again

  • Stokes 'blessed' by England's bowlers after floodlight strategy pays rich dividends

  • Root's mantra: To be 'consistently useful' within evolving England set-up

  • Mitchell disappointed after New Zealand miss out on 'couple of small moments'

  • 'I'm not, as you'd say, Bazball' admits Foakes as Bairstow's return looms large

A rare example of England throttling back and coasting into a position of unassailability. South Africa blew their series lead through misguided team selection, ditching the dangerous Marco Jansen in favour of the second spinner, Simon Harmer – which in turn persuaded Dean Elgar to bat first to the visible delight of his opposite number. Despite being routed for 151, South Africa’s new-ball threat remained potent as England slipped to a wobbly 43 for 3. But Stokes throttled back in a relatively old-school stand with fellow centurion Ben Foakes, to grind out a position from which there could be no escape.Joe Root and Ben Foakes are ecstatic as their unbeaten 120-run stand took England to a five-wicket win at Lord’s•Getty Images

9. New Zealand, Lord’s – Won by 5 wickets

A priceless victory in England’s first outing of the summer, and one that paved the way for everything that followed. Although a number of now-familiar tropes were on display throughout the contest – not least the sight of James Anderson bowling to six slips inside the first 30 minutes of the English summer – the new style was all a bit of a work in progress for a side which, at that stage, still hadn’t won a single Test in ten months. In the end, victory was sealed through a reversion to type. As had been the case throughout 2021, Joe Root stood head and shoulders over his peers, making 115 not out in a challenging chase of 279 – the first fourth-innings hundred of his career. Meanwhile, at the other end, Stokes rode some significant luck to produce a pointedly manic half-century. Though it wasn’t an obvious plan at the time, his refusal to play it safe was intended as a message to his troops.Stuart Broad went on a rampage under the Mount Maunganui floodlights•AFP/Getty Images

8. New Zealand, Mount Maunganui – Won by 267 runs

For all its surface-level bombast, there remains a deeply strategic method to England’s madness, as showcased during the first day-night Test of the Bazball era. As had been the case on the Pakistan tour before Christmas, England’s batting tempo was a means to an end – but rather than driving towards a specific target for New Zealand to chase, Stokes’ main concern was session management, to ensure that his bowlers were granted the best of the conditions under the Mount Maunganui floodlights. The policy worked a treat. England romped along at more than five an over in each innings – ludicrously, they even had to apply the handbrake second-time around after threatening to burn out before nightfall – and twice their enterprise was rewarded by a clatter of twilight wickets. Three on day one, and five on day three, as Stuart Broad, fresh from his comic turn as the “Nighthawk”, embarked on one of rampages.England came from behind to beat South Africa in emphatic fashion at The Oval•Getty Images

7. South Africa, The Oval – Won by nine wickets

Fraught emotions swirled around The Oval following the death of Queen Elizabeth during the first-day washout. Day two was cancelled as a mark of respect, and when the match received special dispensation to continue as a three-day affair, England vowed to win it regardless in her honour … and duly wrapped up the series in a mere 909 balls, their shortest home Test in a century. South Africa were thoroughly discombobulated by the experience – they might have expected to be immune to the hosts’ national tumult, but a spine-tingling rendition of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika scotched that notion. They shipped six wickets in the first hour, and were 118 all out by mid-afternoon, with a resurgent Ollie Robinson claiming 5 for 49. Most teams in England’s position might then have slowed down to speed up: bat once, bat big, and go for the innings win. England, on the other hand, opted to max out on mania. They screeched to 158 all out in barely a session – securing a lead of 40 from exactly the same number of deliveries as their opponents had faced, 218 – then laid into South Africa for a second time on a wild Sunday afternoon. Left with a target of 130, Zak Crawley and Alex Lees then went loco. But for bad light, they might have chased it down that night, instead they returned for five more overs the following morning.Rehan Ahmed is mobbed by his team-mates after dismissing Mohammad Rizwan•Getty Images

6. Pakistan, Karachi – Won by eight wickets

The fast-tracking of Rehan Ahmed, an 18-year-old legspinner with just three first-class appearances to his name, was quite possibly the most atypical selection in England’s Test history. But it also made perfect sense within the new team environment, for not only did Rehan meet the team’s needs on a spin-friendly surface, he arrived with full licence to rip his variations and settle into his work without worrying that a rank long-hop or two would see him banished to the outfield for evermore. On the contrary, that likelihood of looseness was priced into his threat, as Babar Azam discovered after holing out to midwicket to fall for 54 – for Stokes had kept a catcher in that position precisely to seize on any such lapse. A match-seizing five-for followed, whereupon Rehan was shoved up the order to No. 3 in England’s run-chase, with licence to treat his Test debut as an extension of the playground. Two preposterous slogged boundaries telegraphed the glee with which England were now playing their cricket.Mark Wood celebrates after England’s win•Matthew Lewis/Getty Images

5. Pakistan, Multan – Won by 26 runs

Perhaps this was what McCullum had meant about “going harder” when faced with adversity … in this case, Abrar Ahmed, Pakistan’s new mystery spinner, whose flicked front-of-the-hand release produced funky each-way turn and the sort of unknowable threat that had so often derailed less self-assured England line-ups. Sure enough, Abrar ripped out seven wickets on his very first day of Test cricket, but in the process he was taken at nearly a run a ball, as England lived up to their team mantra of “running towards the danger”. And yet, the brains behind England’s brawn was typified by the apparent rookie in their batting ranks. After chipping Abrar to mid-off on the first day for 9, Harry Brook processed his shot selection and vowed not to make the same mistake as he carried England’s second innings with a brilliant 108. “If he dropped one short I was hitting him over midwicket,” he said afterwards. “So it didn’t really matter if it was spinning.” With a taxing target of 355, Pakistan rose to the occasion in a spirited chase, but this time it was Mark Wood’s turn to “go harder”, with a gut-busting display of raw, raucous fast bowling to seal the series in thrilling style.Jamie Overton is congratulated by Jonny Bairstow after reaching fifty in his debut Test•AFP via Getty Images

4. New Zealand, Headingley – Won by seven wickets

If the Power of Positive Thinking could ever be named as Player of the Match, then this was the game in which it played clean out of its skin. By the end of it all, New Zealand were as baffled as they were beaten – particularly after watching a debutant fast bowler, Jamie Overton, rescue England from 55 for 6 in a stand of 241 with Jonny Bairstow that was somehow inevitable and unexpected at the same time. Either side of that opus, Jack Leach twirled his way to a maiden ten-wicket haul, thanks to a captain who had more faith in his bowler than the man himself – as epitomised by Stokes’ refusal to grant Leach a sweeper when the big shots started raining down, particularly from Daryl Mitchell and Tom Blundell, who made 308 runs between them across two innings. By tea on day four, they’d surely done enough to set up a consolation victory… not a bit of it. Chasing a lofty 296, England romped to 183 for 2 by the close, then wrapped things up in barely an hour on the final morning.Joe Root took on India with a brilliant century at Edgbaston•PA Photos/Getty Images

3. India, Edgbaston – Won by seven wickets

A proper statement victory against a team that had bullied England into submission in the 2021 leg of their Covid-interrupted series, and the most emphatic evidence yet that Stokes’ men weren’t joking when they said that all that truly mattered to them was that number in the fourth innings. Pick your target, a daunting 378 on this occasion, and we’ll hunt it down – in a freewheeling 76.4 overs, as it happens, with Bairstow capping the season of his life with a second century in the match, and Root channelling his “inner rockstar” to riff his way to 142 not out from 173. The inevitability of the finish belied the battle that preceded it, not least in India’s first innings, when Rishabh Pant blitzed a breathless 146 from 111 balls, adding 222 in 39 overs with Ravindra Jadeja. And when Jasprit Bumrah reprised his match-turning counterattack at Lord’s in 2021 to carve a stunning 35 runs in a single Broad over, it seemed England had lost the plot. Hindsight, however, has backed up Stokes’ insistence that, for this England team, runs conceded are an irrelevance. By focussing on those ten wickets in every innings, the rest looks after itself.England celebrate the moment of victory as Jack Leach seals the Rawalpindi Test•AFP/Getty Images

2. Pakistan, Rawalpindi – Won by 74 runs

Quite possibly England’s greatest overseas Test victory, and by almost any measure the apogee of Bazball. On a dismally flat deck, in a country where they had won just two Tests out of 24 in 61 years, and even after a sickness bug had decimated the team’s build-up, England made every inch of the running. Stokes opted to bat for the first time in his tenure, and his players responded with mayhem. On the first day alone, they racked up 506 for 4 in 75 overs – the batting equivalent of Usain Bolt at the Beijing Olympics – which meant that, even after batting for the best part of two days in reply, Pakistan could neither wipe off their deficit, nor take enough time out of the game to make a draw inevitable. What happened next, however, was quite remarkable. Faced with little more than a session in which to post a target that was at once tempting yet defendable, England responded with a blistering turn of speed – 264 more runs at 7.36 an over, including Brook’s 87 from 65 balls, which was on course to smash England’s record for the fastest hundred, until he redoubled his intensity with the declaration looming. The eventual equation was 343 in the best part of 100 overs, and it proved as perfectly weighted as a 40-foot putt for glory on the 18th. With the winter sun dipping inexorably after tea, England ripped out the final five wickets in 90 minutes, sealing the contest in the 97th over with minutes of daylight remaining.Jonny Bairstow nails the pull off Trent Boult en route to a 77-ball century•Getty Images

1. New Zealand, Trent Bridge – Won by five wickets

Do you remember the first time? Even after the eye-popping feats of the past nine months, there’s still been nothing to match the shock and awe of Bairstow’s post-tea onslaught on this free-entry final day, as England turned on the afterburners at Trent Bridge to finish the second Test in a riot of strokeplay. “Strip it back, it’s only you and the bowler there,” Bairstow said afterwards in a stream-of-consciousness articulation of the Bazball manifesto (as no one within the England dressing-room would dare to call it). “Ben at the other end said ‘don’t even think about hitting one down [the ground], hit it into the stands … it was do or die, so you’ve got to do.” England, remember, had conceded 553 in New Zealand’s first innings, with Mitchell and Blundell seemingly putting the game out of reach in a 236-run stand. But England muscled back to parity at a then-rapid lick of 4.2 an over, before duking it out in the third innings to give themselves a shot. Their target of 299 in 72 overs ought to have been outlandish. Instead, in a fitting tribute to the white-ball methods that the Test team had so dramatically co-opted, it was sealed in exactly 50.

*At the risk of aggravating England’s head coach, the phrase “Bazball” is used in this context as a convenient short-hand to describe the “new aggressive style of Test match cricket pioneered by England’s head coach Brendon McCullum and captain Ben Stokes in the summer of 2022, characterised by a focus on fast-paced, calculatedly risky batting, and a commitment to a wicket-taking approach with the ball, to heighten the entertainment factor of a Test match, and to encourage positive results where possible, thereby maintaining the appeal and relevance of traditional five-day cricket in an era now dominated by the T20 format.”

With backs against the wall, batters provide New Zealand with an outside shot

Despite being blitzed for the most part of the Test, hosts ended day three in a position to make England worry

Vithushan Ehantharajah26-Feb-2023There’s an argument to say Sunday was New Zealand’s best day of the series.Tom Latham and Devon Conway scored fine half-centuries, registering New Zealand’s highest partnership of the series, beating the previous best set a few hours earlier. They frustrated England no end, almost mockingly chipping away at a bumper lead steadily, at odds with the manner it was accrued. Context, though, is important.Latham and Conway’s stand of 149 in 320 balls was coming in a follow-on innings, the first England had imposed on their opponents since August 2020. New Zealand trailed initially by 226, and it was that much because of skipper Tim Southee’s blitz of 73 from 49 deliveries. He forged a partnership of 98 with Tom Blundell, which at the time was the team’s highest of the series.Related

Tom Latham, Devon Conway lead fight after New Zealand made to follow on

What frustration England had was relative. An entire day in the field was taxing work, particularly for a three-prong seam attack who were sore after the intensity of last week’s victory in the first Test in Mount Maunganui. For a team that likes to win in a hurry, the 94.2 overs in the dirt on the third day would have grated. Nevertheless, the spinners showed up – Jack Leach with two, Joe Root with one – to do their bit. Leach’s dismissal of Will Young, pitching around middle stump, taking the top of off, showed signs the pitch is taking turn more than it usually does at the Basin Reserve in Wellington.Ultimately, the only reason the game is at this stage going into day four is because of the weather. A scheduled 50 overs have been lost, split evenly across days one and two. The latter might have seen New Zealand’s first innings end earlier and cheaper, the follow-on still instigated to expose cracks in a frail batting line-up from Saturday evening into Sunday morning.Ben Stokes arrived at the ground on Sunday morning with a view to enforcing no matter what, which is what he relayed to his charges before heading out there. Across the corridor of the player’s pavilion, things were far less certain.Tom Latham and Devon Conway put a 149-run stand for the opening wicket•AFP/Getty ImagesFast forward to the end of the day and things are a little clearer. A little more hopeful. England have a second go to come – but the arrears are just 24, Kane Williamson and Henry Nicholls set and there is a quiet sense New Zealand could be onto something here.Learning from mistakes has been key. As much as batting coach Luke Ronchi rallied against the idea England’s attacking mantra seeping into the subconscious of their opponents was not the issue with the batting missteps on day two, it was hard not to think otherwise. Latham and Nicholls’ reverse sweeps, Williamson’s uncharacteristic looseness out wide. Issues were trying to be forced when that’s not really the Kiwi way.It was under Brendon McCullum’s leadership, of course, and there’s something neat about him being here for this. You wonder if he is secretly relishing the prospect of a slobberknocker of a finish, as much for another test of the mettle of those now under his care as simply putting on a show.That McCullum is sat in the “other” balcony in “their” stash is something of a sore point for locals. They get it, no doubt, but the transformation of the England team has made them yearn for more excitement from theirs.

“Absolutely. Whether it’s 200, 250 – you just never know. We’ve seen the wicket, it’s still doing enough with the old ball and the new ball, and there’s plenty of turn there.”Latham on whether New Zealand had a chance to force a win

They might still get it in the next couple of days, but it’s worth noting the path to that point began with the kind of grind that led to the 2019 World Test Championship win.”The character of this group, we stand up when things aren’t going so well,” said Latham, who was a surprise runner-up in the leadership race after Williamson stepped down. His role is still as a big personality in the dressing room, not least on ability alone. He became the seventh New Zealand batter to pass 5,000 Test runs, and primarily did that by packing away most of his shots.”We probably didn’t quite do that quick enough the other day,” he said of a lack of leaving in the first innings. In turn, England’s bowlers “came to” the New Zealand batters, trying to target the stumps which allowed enough deliveries to drive or pop into gaps to keep the scoreboard ticking over steadily. Scoring more or less stopped for the second noteworthy partnership between Williamson and Nicholls which was more about the 128 balls than the runs (35) for the fourth wicket.They made it to the new ball, then survived three overs of it. They will rest knowing they have to go again from scratch in the morning, but also aware the overs taken out of James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Ollie Robinson today will count against them tomorrow. And having seen Stokes bowl two poor overs in which he was warned twice and then no-balled for overdoing bouncers, there is reason to believe they can begin to dictate a little more once the AM movement has subsided.Tom Latham scored 83 off 172 balls his second innings•Getty ImagesEven Latham, a pragmatist at heart, admitted to a degree of excitement heading into Monday. The prospect of a series-squaring result and first win under Southee is not something New Zealand are shying away from.”Absolutely,” was Latham’s immediate response to the prospect becoming only the fourth side to win after following on. “You’ve always got to look at [different] ways to win a Test match. We certainly know there is a lot of work to do before that point.”Whether it’s 200, 250 – you just never know. We’ve seen the wicket, it’s still doing enough with the old ball and the new ball, and there’s plenty of turn there.”Just as the weather delayed the progress of this game, it may also curtail the end, to a point. England fell victim to the unpredictable Wellington rains in 2013, similarly asking New Zealand to bat again in the third innings. But respective desire and need for a result other than a draw could win out.After getting pasted in the first Test and blitzed for the best part of three days here, New Zealand are somehow still in a position to make England worry. Granted there is still a lot to be done, and even then Stokes and McCullum run a worry-free dressing room that will back themselves to knock off any total, no matter how big.But that New Zealand are an outside shot is in its own way something to savour. This two-match series could be set for a thrilling finale and, moreover, a smash-and-grab that could give a much-needed push to a transitional era for the hosts.

WTC final FAQs: Dukes ball, reserve day, a first-of-its-kind Oval Test, and more

Also, is the weather likely to hold up? Here’s everything you need to know about the showpiece event’s final between India and Australia

Abhimanyu Bose05-Jun-2023What is the WTC final? Is it a big deal?
The WTC final is essentially like the World Cup final, but for Test cricket. Since 2002, the ICC has awarded a trophy annually to the team that has topped the rankings, but since 2019, they began the World Test Championship (WTC), which sees nine teams compete in two-year cycles in a league. The top-two teams eventually face off in the final.Who won last time?
The final in 2021 was the first ever, held in Southampton. New Zealand became the inaugural champions after beating India.Related

The burden of being Ajinkya Rahane

Pressure on India to win an ICC title after ten-year wait? Not at all, says Dravid

Cummins happy to be 'underdone than overdone'; 'getting mentally ready' key for Rohit

David Warner on the WTC final: 'It should be at least a three-game series'

India keep their options open as Oval build-up intensifies

How did India and Australia get here this time?
The 2021-23 cycle of the WTC kicked off with India’s tour of England in August 2021. India took a 2-1 lead in the series, but the fifth game was postponed to 2022, and England won that to draw the series 2-2. In between, India won a home series 1-0 against New Zealand and then travelled to South Africa, where they were beaten 2-1. It was also after this series that their Test captaincy was passed on from Virat Kohli to Rohit Sharma.India then blanked Sri Lanka 2-0 at home, before that fifth Test against England. Their next Test series saw them go to Bangladesh, where they swept the hosts 2-0. But they were still not sure of qualifying when they faced Australia at home in their final series as part of the WTC cycle. However, a 2-1 series win, coupled with favourable results from Sri Lanka’s tour of New Zealand sealed second place for them.Australia, meanwhile, had started their WTC campaign with an emphatic 4-0 Ashes win at home. A three-Test tour of Pakistan followed, and after draws in the first two games, Australia won the decider in Lahore. Then in Sri Lanka, Australia took the lead in the series, but the hosts won the second Test as the series finished 1-1.That followed another dominant home summer, which started with a 2-0 sweep of West Indies followed by a 2-0 win against South Africa in a three-Test series. However, Australia still hadn’t secured their position in the WTC final when they went to India, but their solitary win of the tour, which came in Indore, and the draw in Ahmedabad were enough to see them qualify.Pat Cummins is all geared up for the WTC final•ICC via Getty ImagesWhat ball will they play with in the final?
The Dukes ball, which is used primarily in England, Ireland and the West Indies, will be used for the final.What happens if the Test is drawn or tied?
In that scenario, both Australia and India will share the WTC trophy for the 2021-23 cycle.Why are they playing at The Oval and not Lord’s?
The ICC wanted a “clean” venue in terms of sponsorships, and Lord’s has some deals in place which made it untenable for the final. Lord’s was supposed to host the 2019-21 WTC final too, but the Covid-19 pandemic forced it to be shifted to Southampton, where it was easier to maintain a bio-bubble for the teams.Have they played many Tests at The Oval in June?
None at all. In fact, this will be the first time that The Oval will be hosting a Test in June. The earliest a Test has started there during the English summer is July 8 in 1982, when England drew against India, as Ian Botham scored a double-century.When will the sixth day be used?
The WTC final does have a reserve day scheduled. But it will be used only if there has been play lost due to bad weather across the regular five days, they are unable to make up for it in those five days, and no result has been reached by the end of day five. The 2019-21 WTC final saw the first day completely washed out, and the game eventually went into the reserve day.What’s the weather forecast?
London is expected to stay mostly sunny through the first three days and the fifth day of the WTC final. However, there are spotty showers of rain expected in the afternoon on day four. The reserve day, should it come into play, is also expected to have clear weather.The 2021 WTC final was interrupted by rain, forcing a sixth day into action•ICC/Getty ImagesAre the teams at full strength?
Unfortunately, neither team can claim to be at full strength. Josh Hazlewood, who picked up a side soreness during the IPL, was replaced in Australia’s squad by Michael Neser three days before the big game. Meanwhile, India will be without key players like Rishabh Pant, Jasprit Bumrah, KL Rahul and Shreyas Iyer.How have India and Australia prepared for the final?
India trained at Arundel in Sussex for nearly a week, before moving to London for the final few days of preparation. While a majority of their contingent arrived in England in batches after the IPL, Cheteshwar Pujara, who did not get an IPL gig this year, has been playing for Sussex in the County Championship.The Australian team also began preparations as a group after members joined them following the IPL. Some of their players too, like Steven Smith, Marnus Labuschagne and Neser, have had red-ball prep by playing county cricket. In fact, Smith and Pujara were team-mates at Sussex this year. Australia trained for three days in Beckenham before moving to London.What are they playing for?
The winners will not only be awarded the Test mace, but will also get a prize of $1.6 million. The runners-up will go home with $800,000.

Stuart Broad has no regrets over not walking at Trent Bridge

Seamer looks back on the controversy of 2013, and the sequence of events it kicked off

Andrew Miller13-Jun-2023Admittedly, the Ashes rivalry hasn’t offered a lot to write home about from recent tours Down Under, but Australia in England on the other hand… now we are talking. From Edgbaston 2005, to the great escape at Cardiff four years later, all the way through to Ben Stokes’ miracle of Headingley in 2019, there’s scarcely been a summer of recent vintage that has not served up an all-time Anglo-Aussie classic. And ten years have now passed since one of the tastiest tussles of the lot.England’s 14-run win at Trent Bridge in the opening Test of the 2013 series had something for everyone… from Ian Bell’s masterful second-innings century to the bittersweet romance of Ashton Agar’s debut 98, all the way through to James Anderson’s tireless ten-for on a dry and unresponsive deck.But in spite of such rich pickings, the incident that truly endures is – from an Australian perspective – the one that got away. Or, as England’s fans might prefer to see it, the one that Stuart Broad got away with.England had conceded a first-innings deficit of 65, and were struggling second time around too before Broad and Bell came together in a match-turning seventh-wicket stand of 138. Without his doughty 65 from 148 balls that spanned the third afternoon and the fourth morning, there would have been no grandstand fifth-day finish.And yet, as Australians recall all too well, that effort should have ended on 37, when Agar tossed up a wide one, into the rough outside the left-hander’s off stump. Broad shaped to cut, the ball ended up in the hands of Michael Clarke at slip, and that should have been that.Aleem Dar, however, thought otherwise, and as Clarke glowered and gesticulated from behind his sunglasses, Broad donned his finest poker-face and stared down his accusers.”I was thinking, ‘we need more runs here, we’re 230 ahead,'” Broad recalled on the eve of the 2023 campaign. “If I get out, we lose the game. So I’m never just going to walk off and accept a loss. I looked up at Aleem and he said not out.”Moments later, in the Sky Sports commentary box, David Lloyd’s instinctive reaction to the first slo-mo replay rather encapsulated the furore that was about to break out. “Oh my goodness me,” he intoned, as the ball clearly kissed off the edge of the bat, onto the tips of Brad Haddin’s gloves, and away into Clarke’s hands… “speechless!””It was all absolute nonsense, wasn’t it?” Broad said. “It still follows me around. Everyone’s been convinced that I nicked it straight to first slip, which is remarkable really. Because even Brad Haddin said afterwards, ‘did you nick that?’, because it cannoned into his gloves and went to first slip.”Related

  • Australia add three-time Ashes-winning coach Andy Flower to backroom staff

  • Pat Cummins 'aiming to play all six' Tests over English summer

  • Moeen considering Test comeback after England Ashes call

  • Is Broad brewing something spectacular ahead of the Ashes?

Broad has had a decade to contemplate the incident, and so it’s perhaps unsurprising that he’s done his research in the interim. By his reckoning, across that year’s home and away Ashes, there were 21 other instances of batters not walking for catches – including, it might be pointed out, Haddin himself, who would eventually be given out on review at the gripping climax to that Trent Bridge Test, when Anderson was shown to have found a thin inside-edge with Australia in touching distance of victory.However, the optics of an edge flying into the hands of first slip – albeit via a double deflection – were always likely to inflame sensibilities. And this was especially so because, as Broad has also posited, the presence of one of two of the so-called press-box “Dukes”, senior sportswriters with an angle to grind, meant the incident was ripe for sensationalism.”If it was just cricket writers in the press box. I don’t think it would have become a story because we’ve all watched a lot of cricket. But it was the weekend before the Premier League started, so it was the sportswriters in – your Ollie Holts, Martin Samuels. They were like, ‘let’s make a big story’. I don’t know if that’s absolute nonsense, but that’s how I’ve dealt with it. That was the reason why it became a talking point.”Broad’s certainly not wrong that the Dukes did go to town on it. “Did Broad injure cricket yesterday?” Samuel asked, rhetorically, in The Daily Mail “Sadly, he did. He didn’t mean to. He was just playing hard, playing to win.”Writing in , meanwhile, under the headline: “What he did wasn’t just disappointing. It was deeply, deeply embarrassing,” Holt said that the incident was reminiscent of “Rivaldo rolling around clutching his face when a ball kicked at him by a Turkey player had hit him on the arm”.”Let’s be honest,” he added. “It was hard to witness what happened without feeling a sense of sadness and contempt.”Broad, however, remains utterly unswayed by such sentiment. “I think I’ve only ever played with one true walker,” he said. “That was Graeme Swann, because he just hit the ball to cover anyway. It’s just not a thing in the modern game. I don’t know anyone that does it. And ultimately, if I had have just wandered off having been given not out, I think I’d have been criticised the other way, because we’ve lost the game.”Stuart Broad stands firmly by his decision not to walk•PRAll of which helped set the parameters for part two of an extraordinary grudge match, in Brisbane four months and three England Test wins later, when Australia’s media took up the cudgels ahead of a series in which Mitchell Johnson and Co. would deliver the ultimate act of vengeance with a 5-0 trouncing.Upon arrival in Australia, Kevin Pietersen had been the initial target of the Aussie media, with the Courier-Mail proclaiming on its front page: “He’s so arrogant not even his own team likes him”. However, when KP responded in a tweet that such attention was good for his ego, the seed of an alternative strategy was germinated, as the newspaper’s editor, Christopher Dore, later told The Guardian.”Stuart Broad earned the role of Ashes villain … by acting with complete contempt for the spirit of the game on that dark day in July,” Dore wrote. “We settled on calling him the ’27-year-old English medium-pace bowler’ in all our reports. We felt this was an even a graver insult than turning him into an asterisk and refusing to publish his image. What fast bowler wouldn’t be furious about being relegated to mediocrity?”It wasn’t just the papers who got stuck in though, as Broad recalled: “Darren Lehmann [Australia’s coach] didn’t help the cause, having eight beers and going on a podcast …”Lehmann, who had taken over from Mickey Arthur just two weeks before that infamous Trent Bridge Test, was cut from a very different cloth to his more schoolmasterly predecessor, and was clearly itching to lay down a marker for his first home campaign, as he addressed the radio station Triple M with a startlingly frank call to arms.”From my point of view, I hope the Australian public give it to him right from the word go, for the whole summer,” he said, to gales of on-air laughter. “I hope he cries and goes home.”Broad said: “A few of the Aussie players came and apologised for their coach, for what he said. But I didn’t cry …” Instead, his response merely added to his legend – and, dare one say it, the grudging respect that he’s long since earned over the course of eight previous Ashes campaigns.After shrugging off the catcalls and banners in the crowd to pick off a first-day five-for at the Gabba, Broad strolled into the press conference with a copy of the Courier-Mail under his arm. Whereupon he was re-christened “The Phantom Menace” for the rest of the Test … at least until Johnson’s fireworks came along to scorch the narrative.”I really enjoyed that Australia tour because it was feisty,” Broad recalled. “It was a bit niggly, I got booed, and all sorts of songs were sung. But that’s quite unique. You don’t boo a player you’re not bothered about, so that’s the way I took it, and that’s the positive I dragged from it.”Overall, however, were he given the chance to relive the events of that first Test of the English summer all over again, how would he play it?”I wouldn’t change it for anything,” Broad said. “Because we won the game by 14 runs, and if I’d have walked off, we’d have lost the game.”Stuart Broad was speaking at the launch of wine merchant Laithwaites’ partnership with England cricket. For exclusive offers on great wines this summer, visit laithwaites.co.uk

Death, taxes and Kate Cross nailing the scoop

England seamer embraces her vulnerabilities and becomes the hero that her team needed

Vithushan Ehantharajah13-Jul-2023There cannot be many more open cricketers than Kate Cross.Part of that is the nature of being a high-profile women’s cricketer. So much of the game’s future is over-reliant on your personality, time and accessibility to cover for decades of under-investment. Media requests are accepted as they come in. Not a selfie or autograph is denied. No stakeholder left behind. Cross is one of the best at it.She co-hosts the No Balls Podcast with good mate and former England cricketer Alex Hartley. In between the insightful cricket chat, they either talk borderline nonsense – as we all do with our best mates – or have deep and productive conversations about mental health, which we probably don’t do enough.Cross has long been open about matters of this nature. She’s never afraid to reopen scars to show us all these anxieties. Only so much of that can be cathartic, but Cross always does so to inform better and show others their struggle is not and should not be alone.In the last few months, she revealed that a tropical virus contracted during a pre-season tour of India in March had left her in doubt for this Ashes series, which could be her last on home soil given she will be 35 in four years, and other younger quicks are already nipping at her heels. But then, on Thursday, in just her second appearance in the multi-format series, she stepped across to the off side to show the world – and most importantly Megan Schutt – her stumps.England needed nine runs to win this first of three ODIs, not just to square series 6-6 but to prevent Australia from retaining the Ashes there and then. Again. Cross had walked in at No.10 with 29 runs remaining, joining her skipper, Heather Knight, who was beginning to wonder if a fifth successive Ashes was slipping away.And as Schutt delivered one of her patented inswingers and Cross stepped across, there was a moment when the 5,731 crowd at Bristol County Ground fell silent. The majority supporting England feared the worst. A moment later, that silence was broken. Even Australian legend Mel Jones on commentary, who has seen more than most, was in awe. “What has just happened?”Well, the scoop shot happened. Away the ball went, over the keeper’s head and, eventually, for four. Cross crashed a drive through the covers two balls later to draw England level with Australia’s 263. Knight had the honour of finishing the match at the start of the next over, cutting the winning boundary through point to take her to a remarkable 75 not out, and immediately flinging her bat away to embrace the player whom she regarded as the hero of the hour.”She loves it, she absolutely loves it!” Alice Capsey said afterwards, buoyed as much by Cross’s outlandish shot selection under pressure as by her own 40 from 34 balls that had jump-started the pursuit of a target of 264. As Hartley put it: “Death, taxes, and Crossy playing the paddle.”Cross herself will be the first to tell you it is her favourite shot, and her team-mates will be queuing a close second to inform you no-one does it better. “She plays it probably the best in the group,” Capsey added. “If you don’t see a ramp, you’re probably asking [Cross] ‘are you okay?'”Heather Knight embraces Kate Cross after the chase•PA Images/GettyTruth be told, Cross was not okay when she walked to the crease, and, typically, had no qualms stating as much. She told BBC Sport her internal dialogue was full of fear of adding to past regrets: “I do not want to lose another Ashes. I have seen us lose too many Ashes.”This had by no means been her best performance. Opening the bowling after being left out of the T20Is, she was struck for two boundaries off her first three deliveries of the match by Alyssa Healy, the second a full toss whipped through midwicket. Though she would snare Healy lbw with the fourth, she went on to have Ellyse Perry dropped on six before dropping a catch of her own to give Beth Mooney a life on 19. Both cashed in with 41 and 81 not out, respectively.Cross’s figures of one for 42 from six overs were comfortably the worst of her team. And she owed thanks to Capsey and Tammy Beaumont for a 74-run stand in 9.1 overs that gave Australia’s quicks – Darcie Brown, Perry, Annabel Sutherland and Tahlia McGrath – even worse economy-rates. But as she walked to the middle, you could understand why Cross was apprehensive. Her upcoming struggle was to be endured publicly.Her captain – her friend – knew what needed to be said. A fundamental tenet of England’s build-up to this series, dialled up to instigate the fightback from 6-0 down, has been to strip this Australian team of their aura. Knight reiterated that: think of Ash Garnder as an off-spinner, Jess Jonassen as merely left-arm orthodox and even Schutt, with all her craft and Australian mongrel, as just another inswinger. No matter who is sending it down, swing if it’s there to be swung at.Having stolen the strike for the 45th over, Cross played out two dots from Jonassen before pouncing on a loose ball to turn it around the corner for four. When Jonassen corrected her line and length with the next delivery, Cross slapped an on-drive for another four. At the time, it seemed like the best shot she’d play.Given the strike a ball into the next over, Cross immediately found a single into the leg side and watched on from the non-striker’s end as Knight dropped to one knee and treated Gardner like just another off-spinner by depositing her over the midwicket fence for six. Two overs later, when Schutt was brought back to do what Schutt does, Knight saw fine leg up in the circle and had an idea. “Paddle’s on.”It was. Out Cross stepped to the off side, up the scoop went over Healy’s head. Cross assumed she was close to being caught by the keeper, and confirmed to the rest of us the contact was not her usual best when she scampered back for the second. Brown had seemingly stopped the ball at the boundary, only to palm it into the advertising sponge. Though Cross would tie the scores two balls later, the audacity of the scoop was a statement in itself that only one team was winning this.Related

Tahlia McGrath calls for 'fearless' cricket as Australia return to their favoured ODIs

Sophia Dunkley to open batting as England embrace 'disruptors' role

Ladies who Switch: Ashes alive with England on a roll

Heather Knight shines bright to keep England's Ashes hopes alive

Alyssa Healy admits: 'The Ashes are on the line, proper' after Bristol cliffhanger

She almost finished it herself, thumping a drive down the ground but straight at Schutt, who could only deflect the ball away. No matter – Knight finished the job at the start of the next over. With two matches to play, England’s first women’s Ashes victory in almost a decade is very much back on the agenda.The finish in the third men’s Ashes Test at Headingley and this first ODI here in the women’s has led to familiar soundbites. Chris Woakes, Mark Wood and now Cross have all spoken of the fact that, while they are not used to being there at the end, and would certainly prefer not to be, being out in the middle at least gives you a say. Even if you want no part in a chase, to be at the crease is to be in control, which in a sport open to chaos, is a blessing.It can also be a curse. You are never more exposed than when you’re out there, particularly indulging in your weaker suit. All those hopes on unfamiliar shoulders, all those past failures just a wrong turn in your mind away from consuming you.Cross, however, had left those thoughts on the other side of the boundary, bringing instead the courage to do right by Knight at the other end, her teammates watching on from the dressing room, and her country. She came armed with that familiar strength emanating from vulnerability. And, of course, her scoop shot.That she walked off to all those cheers before indulging in more media, selfies, and autographs – an emergency podcast in the works – carried a unique feeling this time. Given how forthcoming she has been with her darkest moments, it was only right that so many could share in arguably her brightest.

Gear up for red cards, and the Bravo-Pollard bromance – All you need to know about CPL 2023

Also, where can you follow the games live, and whom are the big new international signings?

Sreshth Shah15-Aug-2023The biggest party in cricket is back?

Yes, there’s more for fans of West Indies cricket to look forward to on the back of their T20I series win against India. The CPL starts on Wednesday, August 16, with defending champions Jamaica Tallawahs taking on hosts St Lucia Kings in Gros Islet.After 30 league games, the top four – out of six teams – will qualify for the playoffs and the final is scheduled for September 24 in Providence, Guyana.How many countries will the CPL visit this time?

The CPL 2023 season will be played in five countries: St Lucia, St Kitts, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, and Guyana. Each country will get six league games across four match days. Guyana will additionally host the playoff leg.That sounds… tiring.

Well, yes and no.Games are spaced out – with only four match days every week. At each location, there will be two weekday games, followed by a break, and then four double-header games on Saturday and Sunday.After that, there’s a break again before cricket resumes the following week in a new country following the same pattern. In all, there are only 24 match days even though the tournament lasts 39 days.Related

  • There's life after Bravo for St Kitts & Nevis Patriots

  • In a first, CPL to use 'red card' in bid to combat slow over-rates

  • Five West Indian rookies who could become big names in the CPL

But… Tallawahs don’t have a home game.

Yes, the CPL is not going to Jamaica, but neither did it last season, and Tallawahs won the title anyway. So home advantage has never mattered too much in the CPL.Tallawahs are a strong side with Brandon King, Imad Wasim, Fabian Allen and Alex Hales in their squad. What they seemingly lack is a high-quality wristspinner.Who are the other strong sides?

Guyana Amazon Warriors have been historically strong. They have five runner-up trophies and have reached the playoffs in each of the last three seasons. That side – with Shimron Hetmyer, Azam Khan, Romario Shepherd and Rahmanullah Gurbaz, among others – is consistently dangerous.With Dwayne Bravo joining forces once again with good friend Kieron Pollard, four-time champions Trinbago Knight Riders will also be quite keen on making strong return after finishing last in 2022.Dwayne Bravo and Kieron Pollard will reunite at Trinbago Knight Riders•WICB Media/Brooks LaTouche Photography LtdAny funky rules in CPL 2023?

Nothing too out-of-the-box, just a simple red card! According to new playing conditions, if the fielding side is operating too slowly, there might be a situation where the umpire asks one fielder to exit the field in the 20th over.This could be a big gamechanger for batting sides, but it’s the most extreme step in a series of new rules written up to combat a slow pace of play. Even batting sides can be hit with a five-run penalty if they are wasting time.Who are the overseas players to watch out for?

Among new entrants into the CPL, Ambati Rayudu, the recently retired India international, has signed up with St Kitts and Nevis Patriots. Zimbabwe’s Sean Williams joins St Lucia Kings while Pakistan’s Mohammad Haris will represent Amazon Warriors.The spin duo of Qais Ahmad and Maheesh Theekshana give Barbados Royals an edge in that department. The star South African batter Dewald Brevis is with the Patriots, while Faf du Plessis and Sikandar Raza bring experience to Kings. Head over to oursquads page for the full line-ups.How can fans outside the Caribbean catch the action?

Every match of CPL 2023 will have live ball-by-ball commentary on ESPNcricinfo. Fans in India can watch on FanCode. USA and UK viewers can watch on Willow TV and BT Sport respectively. Fox Sports is broadcasting in Australia, Sky Sports NZ in New Zealand and SportsMax TV across the Caribbean. Fans in Pakistan can watch on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.Exciting… can’t wait for it to all kick off!

If you’re from Asia, you might have to rethink that unless you plan to be up on the wee hours. Most games are scheduled for 7pm local which is 4.30am in India and 4am in Pakistan. You’ll have better chances catching games live on double-header days, when the first game is at 10am local time – that is, 7.30pm in India and 7pm in Pakistan.

Are Pakistan undercooked? Will India perfect their balancing act?

With the ODI World Cup looming, our correspondents weigh in on the big questions facing the teams during the Asia Cup

25-Aug-20232:11

Rohit on Chahal’s exclusion: ‘Wanted someone who can bat at eight or nine’

Wanted: bowlers who can batIndia are taking 17 players to the Asia Cup – so they are yet to finalise their World Cup 15 – but if the recovery of key personnel has gone well, their squad is now close to full strength. With Hardik Pandya and Ravindra Jadeja playing together, India no longer need a batter who can bowl, but their most severe headache is that none of their four first-choice bowlers can hit sixes.India’s four best specialist bowlers are Jasprit Bumrah, Kuldeep Yadav, Prasidh Krishna and Mohammed Siraj, with Mohammed Shami as back-up, which severely limits the risks that the top seven can take. This issue has necessitated the inclusion of Shardul Thakur and Axar Patel, one of whom will most likely play as the No. 8 depending on conditions and opposition.Still, in a big match in the Asia Cup, India must try to see how the batters react to playing with four No. 11s, who in turn become a potent threat with the ball.Related

Chameera could miss entire Asia Cup, Hasaranga unlikely for initial games

Asia Cup 2023 – Where, when, who, what, and everything else

Rahul's fitness in the spotlight as India begin six-day conditioning camp

Are Pakistan undercooked?Simply put, Pakistan are short on game time. They have arguably never gone into an ODI World Cup as undercooked as they are right now. Since the end of the 2019 World Cup, Pakistan have played just 28 ODIs, a little more than the 25 they played between the 1979 and 1983 World Cups. The quality of opposition they have faced was also not great. Six of Pakistan’s ODIs were against teams who failed to qualify for the tournament in India, with a further three against Netherlands.By the time the Asia Cup begins, they will have played another three matches against Afghanistan, but so far their only ODI cricket this year has been eight matches against New Zealand, who were significantly depleted for the last five of those games. While Pakistan have beaten most teams with relative ease, winning 19 of those 28 matches, their ability to step up against higher-quality oppositions will be scrutinised.Pakistan haven’t played many ODIs against high-quality teams since the previous World Cup•AFP/Getty ImagesCan Afghanistan convert potential into progress?Afghanistan have the quality to challenge every team in this Asia Cup, but is it accompanied by a resolute mentality? Despite the turmoil in the country over the past couple of years, Afghanistan’s cricket team has seen steady, incremental improvement, and they appear to come into each series and tournament stronger than the last.They have globetrotting T20 stars Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Rashid Khan and Mujeeb Ur Rahman, as well as the steadying influences of Mohammad Nabi and Hashmatullah Shahidi that should serve them well in 50-overs cricket. But defeats in several previous Asia Cup campaigns – especially against Pakistan in 2022 when they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory – are bound to leave scars. A T20I series win over Pakistan in March – even though it was against a second-string side – should help, and three ODIs against the same opposition in the week before the tournament begins will offer match practice. How they perform there and whether they can put together an Asia Cup run that truly reflects the progress they have made should be a point of intrigue leading into the ODI World Cup.Should Bangladesh play seven batters or eight? With two allrounders in their XI in Shakib Al Hasan and Mehidy Hasan Miraz, Bangladesh have the option of playing an extra specialist batter or bowler. Former captain Tamim Iqbal believes the extra bowler gives their attack security, but an eighth batter could mean precious extra runs.Bangladesh have lately tended to play the extra batter, and it brought them stunning results when Mehidy made match-winning contributions from No. 8 – 38* and 100* – in successive ODIs against India last December. The same combination, however, featured in series defeats to England and Afghanistan, so there is still scepticism over whether the extra batter is the right way to go.One school of thought is that playing one fewer specialist batter will place more responsibility on the top seven and more trust in Mehidy’s improved batting. It’s still not clear which way Bangladesh will go at the World Cup, and results during the Asia Cup may well dictate their choice.Afghanistan have been impressive in bilateral series, but are yet to produce a stirring performance in a global tournament•AFP/Getty ImagesCan Sri Lanka’s batters pull their weight?Twice this year, across two continents, Sri Lanka have been all out for less than 80 in ODIs. They have passed 300 four times, but one of those occasions was after India had amassed 373 for 7 on the same Guwahati pitch.At the World Cup Qualifier, facing – on average – significantly worse opposition than they are expected to come across at the Asia Cup and the World Cup, they were restricted to 245 all out by Scotland, then 213 all out and 233 all out by Netherlands. Sure, Sri Lanka went on to defend all those scores. But that was only because their varied attack bailed the batting out.Perhaps there is an argument that in the 21st century, at least, Sri Lanka have relied more on their bowling to get them deep into major tournaments than their batting. Their run to five global tournament finals between 2007 and 2014 was driven largely by the likes of Lasith Malinga, Nuwan Kulasekara, Muthiah Muralidaran, Ajantha Mendis and, later, Rangana Herath.But their batting lacks top-order dynamism, has little heft through the middle (save for Charith Asalanka at No. 5, perhaps), and when Dasun Shanaka fails, as he often has in the last few months, they cannot finish strong.Against batting orders such as India’s, Pakistan’s, and Bangladesh’s, good bowling may not be able to perform major rescue operations.

In Williamson's absence, Latham steps up as astute leader

New Zealand have had several injury setbacks during their World Cup campaign, but their stand-in captain has ensured they have four wins in four games

Deivarayan Muthu20-Oct-2023No Kane Williamson? No problem for New Zealand. Tom Latham has made sure of that.When Williamson hadn’t fully recovered from surgery for the anterior cruciate ligament he ruptured in the IPL this year, Latham led New Zealand to victory in their World Cup opener against England in Ahmedabad. Then, when Williamson fractured his thumb against Bangladesh, Latham once again captained New Zealand to a 149-run win against Afghanistan.Latham insists his leadership style is similar to Williamson’s but there’s a bit of Brendon McCullum about him. He doesn’t let the game drift and isn’t afraid of taking risks. Against England, for instance, he gambled on using Matt Henry in the middle overs rather than holding him back for the death. Henry whipped up a wobble-seam delivery to dismiss Jos Buttler and cracked the game open for New Zealand. Against Afghanistan, Latham similarly brought Trent Boult back in the middle overs and dismissed allrounder Azmatullah Omarzai.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn the 2015 World Cup, McCullum used to try and kill off games in the powerplay by giving extended new-ball spells to Boult and Tim Southee. Now, Latham is trying to kill off games in the middle overs. Wickets lost between overs 31 and 40 significantly diminish a team’s ability to finish strong. That’s why Latham goes to his best options even if it leaves him short-handed later. It’s also why when he batted during this phase against Afghanistan on Wednesday, he prioritised being out there at the death over breaking the shackles. And it worked. New Zealand may have scored only three boundaries between overs 31 and 40 but they quadrupled that count in overs 41-50. Latham, as captain, appears innately tuned to the rhythm of the game.”I don’t think I’m a captain that’s hugely different to how Kane operates,” Latham tells ESPNcricinfo. “For me, it’s always been about the team in terms of trying to ensure we continue doing what we’ve done as a group as best as possible, rather than me coming in and doing something that’s completely different. I think when you’re forced into a situation when you have a couple of injuries, obviously Lockie [Ferguson] going down [with back stiffness against England]… It was tight in terms of how you want to operate, but from that game for me it was about trying to be proactive as best as you can.”I guess it comes across as me making the right decisions, but at the end of the day it’s the bowlers doing the job. They’re the ones taking the wickets, so that in turn makes the captaincy look like it’s a good thing, but I think from our bowlers’ point of view, they’ve been doing a fantastic job, especially in that first game. For me, it’s always been about trying to be proactive, especially in this tournament where conditions are slightly different than what we are used to back home.”Latham was destined to be a leader. At 14, he took on Shane Bond on his Christchurch senior club debut. At 20, he became Canterbury’s youngest captain, and more recently in 2021, he marshalled Canterbury to the one-day Ford Trophy title. But Latham downplays all of that and says he’s still a work in progress as a captain.Related

Tactics board: India's top order vs Boult and Henry, Santner's threat in the middle overs

Unbeaten India, New Zealand clash with history on their back

NZ keep perfect record as Afghanistan fall apart in chase of 289

Hardik Pandya ruled out of NZ game with ankle injury

“I’ve been fortunate enough to be in this group since 2012, I think, when I made my debut. So, I’m sort of one of the older ones (laughs) in the group or one of the more experienced guys, so you tend to lean on experiences that you’ve had in the past – whether that would be through playing or being a leader, but I guess we’ve been fortunate enough … certainly in my time as a Black Cap, we’ve had some great leaders – the likes of Brendon McCullum, and obviously Kane, who is the captain of this team.”Latham also draws inspiration from former All Blacks captain Richie McCaw. “Being from Canterbury, I’ve been a passionate Crusaders supporter and an All Blacks supporter,” Latham says. “I guess seeing what he did with the All Blacks and also with the Crusaders was pretty inspiring. Probably more so with the player he was but also the leader he was. So, as I said, sometimes it’s not necessarily the on-field stuff, it’s the off-field stuff that’s probably more important in terms of pushing the team in the right direction.”ESPNcricinfo LtdLike his captaincy, Latham’s batting often goes unnoticed. In Tests, he does the difficult job of opening in result-oriented conditions. In ODIs, he has to deal with spinners operating with the softer ball, and his middle-order numbers are among the best in the world. Since the end of the 2019 World Cup, Latham has scored 1345 runs in 36 innings at an average of 43.38 and strike rate of 91.12. Among middle-order batters in this World Cup, only Mushfiqur Rahim, KL Rahul and Charith Asalanka have more runs than Latham during this period.”I guess for me, from a one-day point of view, the challenge batting in the middle order is that the situation is always different,” Latham says. “You could be in at 30 for 3 or you could be in at 200 for 3. So being adaptable is probably the biggest thing that I’ve learnt in this role since batting in the middle order – trying to read every situation as best as possible and understanding who is batting around you.”Again, conditions are going to be different on different surfaces and I guess we’re probably going to see this throughout the World Cup, where pitches might start to deteriorate a bit towards the end of the tournament. Being adaptable for me is the biggest thing and it’s something I pride myself on as best as I can.”Latham admits he isn’t a big power-hitter down the ground. Instead, he tries to attack spinners with a variety of sweeps, including the reverse. Latham minimises the risk of sweeping by getting his front pad out of the way and maintaining a low centre of gravity.”It’s a shot that I don’t necessarily practice a lot,” Latham explains, when asked about how he chooses the sweep. “Some guys can just stand there and whack it back over their [bowlers] heads like that. For me, that’s not necessarily an easy shot. Playing a sweep shot comes a little bit naturally to me. You just see the length or the line and then play accordingly. Again, every bowler is slightly different and there are different challenges with the sweep shot – whether there’s more bounce, quicker or slower.”Latham recalls nailing the sweep against India at the Wankhede in 2017, in what was his first innings from the middle order in India. The shot could serve him well in their World Cup match against India in Dharamsala on Sunday.”I do remember a series over here,” Latham says. “I mean it was the first time that I actually batted in the middle order. When I first started, we played in Mumbai, then to Pune and Kanpur and that time it was a shot that was working really well. I was just able to react to the ball and in these conditions where it’s slightly slower, I tend to use the sweep shot a little bit more. And from a bowler’s point of view, you tend to sweep their best ball and again there have been times where it hasn’t worked so well, but I guess that’s the beauty of batting.”While most of the attention will be on Rohit Sharma when he walks out for the toss with Latham on Sunday, underestimate the New Zealand captain at your own peril.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus