Stats – Rachin emulates Sachin, but Fakhar steals the show

Stats highlights from a run-fest in Bengaluru, which went Pakistan’s way after rain intervened

Sampath Bandarupalli04-Nov-202363 – Balls needed for Fakhar Zaman to complete his century, the fastest by a Pakistan batter at the men’s ODI World Cup. The previous fastest was by Saleem Malik, who scored a 95-ball 100 against Sri Lanka in 1987.11 – Sixes by Fakhar during his unbeaten 81-ball 126 are the joint-most in an ODI innings for Pakistan, levelling Shahid Afridi’s 11 against Sri Lanka in 1996. He is also only the fourth batter to hit ten or more sixes in a men’s ODI World Cup innings.194* – Partnership between Fakhar and Babar Azam for the second wicket, the highest for Pakistan in men’s ODI World Cups. Saeed Anwar and Wajahatullah Wasti also had a 194-run opening partnership against New Zealand in the 1999 semi-final.401 for 6 – New Zealand’s total in Bengaluru is their second-highest in men’s ODIs, behind the 402 for 2 they scored against Ireland in 2006. It is also their highest total at the men’s ODI World Cup, bettering the 393 for 6 they scored against West Indies in 2015.1 – Previous instance of Pakistan conceding a 400-plus total in men’s ODIs – 444 for 3 by England in the 2016 Trent Bridge ODI. The 401 by New Zealand is also the highest for any team against Pakistan in the men’s ODI World Cup, comfortably ahead of the 367 for 9 by Australia earlier in this tournament, also in Bengaluru.ESPNcricinfo Ltd46 – The number of fours hit by the New Zealand batters against Pakistan are the most in a men’s ODI World Cup innings, surpassing the 45 by South Africa against Sri Lanka in Delhi earlier in the tournament. The 46 fours are the most that New Zealand have ever hit in a men’s ODI innings and the most conceded by Pakistan.3 – Hundreds by Rachin Ravindra in this World Cup. He is the first batter to have scored three hundreds in their first men’s ODI World Cup.1 – Ravindra also became the first player to score three centuries for New Zealand in men’s ODI World Cups. Six batters have had two World Cup centuries for New Zealand, including Kane Williamson, who fell five runs short of his third in this match.ESPNcricinfo Ltd1 – Ravindra’s three hundreds are also the most for any batter before turning 25 in the men’s ODI World Cup, surpassing Sachin Tendulkar’s two. The two batters are currently level on 523 for most runs scored before turning 25 in an edition of the World Cup.3 – Pakistan bowlers to have conceded 80-plus runs on Saturday – Shaheen Shah Afridi (90), Hasan Ali (82) and Haris Rauf (85). It is only the sixth instance of three or more bowlers conceding 80-plus runs in a men’s ODI innings. The runs conceded by Afridi and Rauf in this game are the top-two most-expensive figures for Pakistan in the men’s ODI World Cup.ESPNcricinfo Ltd16 – Sixes conceded by Rauf in this World Cup across eight matches. These are the most sixes conceded by a bowler in an edition of the men’s ODI World Cup (since 1999). The previous highest was 15 by Tinashe Panyangara in the 2015 edition in six games.180 – The partnership between Ravindra and Williamson is the second-highest for New Zealand in the men’s ODI World Cup, behind the unbeaten 273 involving Ravindra and Devon Conway against England in the tournament opener. The 180 stand is also the second-highest partnership against Pakistan in World Cups, behind the 259-run opening stand by Mitchell Marsh and David Warner earlier in the tournament.2 – New Zealand’s 401 for 6 is the second-highest first-innings total in ODIs to end in a defeat. Australia’s 434 for 4 against South Africa during the 2006 Johannesburg ODI is the highest.4 – Consecutive losses for New Zealand. They lost to India, Australia and South Africa in their previous three games. It is the first instance of New Zealand suffering four successive defeats in an edition of the men’s ODI World Cup.

Gouher Sultana's ten-year hiatus

The left-arm spinner stopped being picked by India in 2014. Now she is back at the highest level, playing in the WPL

S Sudarshanan17-Feb-2024Gouher Sultana is on the verge of playing top-level cricket after a decade away.The left-arm spinner last played for India in 2014. She was dropped after the Women’s T20 World Cup in Bangladesh that year, where India merely managed to secure qualification for the 2016 tournament. From her debut in May 2008 till her last ODI, she was the fifth-most prolific spinner in the format. In fact, in each of her last two ODI outings – against Sri Lanka – she returned four-wicket hauls.She was 26 then.It was not how Gouher wanted her career to end, so she focused on plying her trade in domestic cricket. She played for Hyderabad, Puducherry, Railways and Bengal. There were some compelling performances along the way, like when she was the joint-third leading wicket-taker in the Senior Women’s T20 Trophy in 2019-20. Not that those showings put her in the reckoning for selection for India, or for the Women’s T20 Challenge – the exhibition tournament that preceded the Women’s Premier League and was played for four seasons.In sport, we applaud the new, but it can also often be a country for the old. Selectors, especially in women’s cricket, scoff at age, but birth certificates don’t reflect what athletes feel within. That has been especially true of Gouher, and her desire to stay in the game and her relentlessness bore fruit in December 2023, when UP Warriorz raised the paddle to take her on board for WPL 2024. “I was not convinced that I was finished,” she says.At close to 36 years, she now has another opportunity in top-flight cricket, and is one of only two Indians in the competition – Harmanpreet Kaur is the other – to have made their international debuts before 2010.”Even when I was about to give up, I was like, ‘No, this shouldn’t be the end. I want to end it the way I want it'”•Gouher Sultana”There was absolutely no communication [from the selectors],” she says of how her time in international cricket came to an end. “That’s how it is done here; it is the system. When someone is dropped, they are not told what is wrong, or what areas need to be improved, and things like that. Because I got those wickets in my last [ODI] series, I felt that couldn’t be the end to my career.”There were times when I thought of quitting – seasons I didn’t do well, my mental health was affected. But then even when I was about to give up, I was like, ‘No, this shouldn’t be the end. I want to end it the way I want it.’ It was not to prove anything to anybody, but I enjoyed playing and I still enjoy playing. That’s the primary reason I am still here.”The domestic circuit can make for an uphill trek for those who are close to the senior side; it is tougher when you are not even on the periphery. As the years ticked by, Gouher knew she had to be at the top of her game to make the cut.”If I am playing, I don’t want to be a burden to the team,” she says. “I don’t want people to think that it is okay to have me because I have represented India in the past and am a senior player. If I am playing for a team, I want to contribute to winning and want to be one of the best players. When that doesn’t happen – and when I stop contributing to the team’s success or growth – that is the time I will quit.”The culture in India is that you are considered ‘old for sport’ even when you are 26 or 27. Once you are dropped, nobody is looking back and getting you back in. After 30, you put on weight. I did not want to give anyone a chance to talk about my fitness.”The face of the sport has changed since the time she was an India international. The average scoring rate in T20Is that Full Members played in the seven years between 2008 and 2014 was 5.80. Since January 2015, it is at 6.57. The spotlight on the women’s game has increased manifold. Keeping up with the pace did take its toll on Gouher.Gouher dismisses Urooj Mumtaz of Pakistan off her own bowling in the 2009 T20 World Cup•Richard Heathcote/Getty Images”There were a lot of self-doubts even before WPL came up, and that affected my mental health,” she says. “There were a few years in which I was not able to land the ball where I wanted to. It was not because of lack of practice. It was because I put myself under unnecessary pressure – to make a comeback and play at a higher level.”In 2019 I was playing for Bengal for the first time, and they were the champions of the Senior Women’s One Day Trophy the year before. I did well in the T20 trophy for the team and we went to the knockouts, where we playing Baroda in the quarter-final. That was a televised game, and I was playing one after a very long gap. I was like, ‘Okay people are going to watch. Now that I have done well in the league stage, this is the time I want to show and prove people wrong and perform.'”A couple of tough years followed. That was when Nooshin Al Khadeer, India’s head coach when the side won the first Under-19 Women’s T20 World Cup, intervened. Gouher looked up to Al Khadeer, a former team-mate at India and then Railways, who insisted that she try speaking to a psychologist. “I was not very open about it because people don’t understand,” Gouher says. “And I was anyway not playing at the highest level at that time. I was like, ‘I don’t know if they will be interested in talking to me’ but [the psychologist] was kind enough.”Al Khadeer herself provided valuable inputs. “Noosh has always helped me in my career in every stage,” Gouher says. “I have had a lot of conversations with her, and she has always helped me with practice sessions or [work on] the kind of mindset I have. We still talk about how cricket is evolving. I try to take experience from her and put in the hard work required.”That’s when things got a bit better. I then started focusing on my process and not on the results. Since last year I have been much, much better, in terms of mental aspect, and even my practice sessions have been way better. I think my performance also got better.”Gouher’s ten wickets in the domestic T20s last year were the joint most for Bengal, with Sukanya Parida. She returned to play for Hyderabad this season and took eight wickets in the T20s, the second most for them. “Even if you take the last five seasons, this has been one of the best seasons in terms of the ball coming out of my hands,” she says. “The ball is in control. For a bowler, that is the best thing you can have.”Gouher says that her career and mental health took a turn for the better after she spoke to a psychologist. “Even my practice sessions have been way better,” she says•Gouher SultanaThe teams for the Women’s T20 Challenge used to be picked by the national selectors, unlike the WPL, where it is done by auction. Gouher found no takers in the inaugural season, and so putting her name up for the auction for 2024 felt like more of a gamble, but it was one she wanted to take. In the auction she drew no bids in the first round but Warriorz chose her at base price for their final pick.She was on the morning shift at her day job with the Indian Railways and kept an eye on the auction while at work. “After no one picked me in the first round, I was like, ‘Okay it won’t happen,'” she laughs. “Honestly, I was not expecting [to be picked] but since you have registered, you watch, and somewhere you hope. I wasn’t expecting especially UP Warriorz, because they already had two left-arm spinners [Sophie Ecclestone and Rajeshwari Gayakwad]. Other teams at least had a vacancy in that department.”I switched it off and went shopping. I was not feeling okay with all the anticipation. Then I got a call from Warriorz and did not know how to react. I was nervous and excited at the same time. Slowly it sunk in that I will be part of WPL 2024.”Despite the challenges she faced in her own career at various stages, Gouher’s desire to help other cricketers develop has been a constant. A fine reader of the game, she has offered tactical inputs and insights into technique to team-mates and others. In fact, she says wanting to do that was one of the driving forces behind her return to Hyderabad ahead of the 2023-24 season.She began her career with the side in 2006-07 and played most of her domestic cricket for them. Her performances there got her an India call-up, and she finished among the top three wicket-takers in the Senior Women’s One Day Trophy in 2010-11 and 2011-12, and fourth in 2008-09.”After 30, you put on weight. I did not want to give anyone a chance to talk about my fitness”•Gouher Sultana”I want to make this team grow back again and be like how it was when we used to play,” she says. “There were a lot of occasions when we were in the top three or four for quite a lot of seasons. There are a lot of young and talented cricketers in Hyderabad. I want to help these cricketers grow.”Gouher credits her mother, who she says has been her pillar, for this characteristic. “She has taught me at every step of life that before yourself, try and help others, and it will come back to you. If I can help others and it helps them even 1%, that makes me happy. Irrespective of how I was doing, I wanted to help young cricketers as much as I could, pass on knowledge and experience I had.At Warriorz she will play alongside Gayakwad, who at 32 is no more a first choice in white-ball cricket for India. In fact, it was Gayakwad’s rise back in 2014 that helped India move on from Gouher.”We haven’t played a lot of cricket together but we have a bonding,” Gouher says. “Whenever we meet, playing against each other also, we have always greeted each other well. She has done a lot of good work for the country. She has contributed to India’s success more than me. If I can learn a thing or two from her and Sophie Ecclestone, it would be great to add to my armoury.”And so, Gouher is back, almost ten years since she last played international cricket. She is wiser and has unfinished business. All these years she has worked in the trenches, away from the world’s glare. Now every ball that comes out of her hand will be watched by hundreds of thousands, and be analysed by plenty. And she will have a shot at writing her destiny and getting the closure she desires.

Bedlam in Bengaluru: The drama of two Super Overs

For the first time in history, a tied T20 international was decided after not one but two Super Overs

Ashish Pant18-Jan-20243:53

Takeaways: Relief for Rohit, spin-allrounder conundrum for India

10.34pm IST Mukesh Kumar is having a long discussion with his captain Rohit Sharma. With 18 to defend in the final over of the third T20I in Bengaluru, after India had walloped 212 for 4, he’s already conceded 16 off the first five balls.There’s a lot of hand-waving and gesturing going around as the subdued crowd finds its voice once again, filling the Chinnaswamy Stadium with ‘India, India’ chants. At the other end Gulbadin Naib is batting like a man possessed. He’s clattered 53 off 22. Afghanistan need three off one, but finding the boundary is easier than running three at this venue.Mukesh runs in and nails a wide yorker almost on the tramline outside of. Naib is good enough to connect and everything that had slowed down up until that point speeds up 2X. The non-striker Sharafuddin Ashraf sprints and so does Naib. Rinku Singh hares to his right from deep cover but his throw to the wicketkeeper is weak. Naib makes it back for two but the third is out of the question. Cue Ian Smith’s iconic line “We’re going to a Super Over”!Naib looks spent on his haunches, the Afghanistan dugout appear stunned, Rohit and Mukesh allow themselves a smile, and there is absolute bedlam in the stands. After nearly three hours and 36 minutes, 40 overs and 424 runs, while the rest of the city is close to shutting shop for the night, the cricket is still alive.Related

The Rohit hundred that brought more relief than elation

India win epic contest after two Super Overs against Afghanistan

Rohit Sharma becomes the most prolific T20I centurion

Dravid on Rohit retiring in Super Over: 'Ashwin-level thinking'

10.42pm, the first Super Over : Despite the inevitable hassle of a late commute home, barely a soul has left the ground. The air is filled with tension and anticipation. The DJ tries to play to the crowd but the occasion doesn’t need music.India appear relaxed. Avesh Khan cracks a joke, leaving Kuldeep Yadav and Virat Kohli in splits. Mukesh has the unfunny job of bowling the Super Over.Afghanistan appear more serious. Rahmanullah Gurbaz is padded up while Naib never even took his pair off after the 20th over of a stupendous chase. He looks like he’s in a trance. Has he even blinked in the last half hour?Naib takes strike and the roar reaches a crescendo as Mukesh nails his yorker again. The ball is played to long-on but this time the throw is anything but weak. Kohli fires it in on the bounce to Sanju Samson and Naib has no hope of completing the second. Pandemonium in the stands.4:28

Dravid: Really good gut call from Rohit to give Bishnoi second Super Over

Gurbaz and Mohammad Nabi manage a four and a six but it is the events off the final ball that takes the intensity into overdrive. After missing a yorker, Nabi attempts to run a bye to the wicketkeeper. Samson throws the ball towards the bowler but it hits Nabi’s leg – he didn’t know the throw was coming at him and did not change direction – and they run two more overthrows to Kohli at long-on.Rohit is fuming, both hands in the air as he protests with a “come on!” Kohli stops the ball with his foot and gestures in annoyance even before throwing towards the pitch. Words are exchanged; Kohli sarcastically claps and flashes a thumbs up; Nabi doesn’t back down. No one’s laughing now. A dead rubber? What’s that?After the game, when the adrenaline had slowed, India’s coach Rahul Dravid played down that flash point. “Sometimes when you play for your country, there is so much passion and emotion. Nothing in the rule stops you from actually running those runs,” he said. “There are some frustrations that at times can happen but it’s okay as long as it does not cross the line.”Back in the middle, India need 17 off their Super Over and are opening with Rohit and Yashasvi Jaiswal. After scoring only two off the first two balls, Rohit hammers Azmatullah Omarzai for sixes off the next two. He takes a single off the fifth, and with India needing two off the last ball and Jaiswal on strike, Rohit retires seemingly to have the faster runner Rinku at the non-striker’s end. After the game, Dravid told the broadcasters: “[Rohit] Taking himself out was Ashwin-level thinking. That’s Ash-level thinking.”Rinku eventually scampers a single after Jaiswal can only toe-end his shot along the ground to the keeper. Gurbaz collects and chooses not to risk an overthrow by attempting a run out, sending the game – for the first time in T20 internationals and only the second in all T20 cricket – into a second Super Over.Rohit Sharma wasn’t happy with Afghanistan running overthrows after the ball deflected off Mohammad Nabi’s leg•BCCIThis type of tiebreaker – Super Over after Super Over after Super Over – is relatively recent in cricket. It replaced the infamous boundary-count back rule that decided the 2019 World Cup final in England’s favour against New Zealand.Rohit, though, has been here before. He was the Mumbai Indians captain when their IPL game against Punjab Kings was decided only after two Super Overs in Dubai in October 2020. “We don’t even get a third hit in Test matches,” he said after the game in Bengaluru. “It was in the IPL where we played two Super Overs and I batted three times there as well [Rohit batted twice in that game].”11.06pm, the second Super Over: Scenes of utter confusion in Bengaluru. Among the fans but also the players. There are hands on heads and hugs as heightened excitement melds with mental and physical exhaustion. This time Rohit does come out to bat, along with Rinku, for a third hit. Whether he should have been allowed to is another story.Given this was only the second time a T20 had gone into a second Super Over, everyone was figuring out what’s what. Afghanistan coach Jonathan Trott said later that he wanted Omarzai to bowl again but found out the rules stated: [a]ny bowler who bowled in the previous Super Over shall be ineligible to bowl in the subsequent Super Over.”We wanted Azmat to bowl the second over again, but those sort of things will be explained … because it has happened, these things will be explained and done in writing in the future,” Trott said.India won the series 3-0 after a historic contest against Afghanistan•BCCISo instead of Omarzai, it’s the left-arm seamer Fareed Ahmed with the ball. Rohit, who has already scored 121 off 69 and 13 off 4 in this match, clobbers the first two balls for a six and four and then takes a single. India go on to lose their two wickets off the next two balls, leaving Afghanistan needing 12 to win in their Super Over.Now Naib can’t bat again because he was dismissed in the first Super Over so its Nabi who walks out with Gurbaz, both of whom can bat again because they ended the first Super Over not out. Avesh Khan is warming up to bowl for India and speaks to the bowling coach Paras Mhambrey. But Rohit has a late change of heart and gives the ball to the legspinner Ravi Bishnoi.”I think Rohit went with his gut,” Dravid said later. “I think he felt that the spinner had a better chance to take two wickets. It was one of those days where 11 wasn’t probably a huge score and with the power they had, they probably would’ve got the 12 runs. So, you needed to take two wickets.”The decision proves a masterstroke. Bishnoi has both Nabi and Gurbaz caught by Rinku on the straight boundary within the first three balls.Nearly four and a half hours after the first ball was bowled, this game is finally over. It had begun as a dead rubber and ended as the most glorious of dead rubbers.

Fierce competitors: what Nepal want to be at their second World Cup appearance in a decade

Their captain, Rohit Paudel, and coach, Monty Desai, talk about the side’s dream run over the last 18 months and what they hope to achieve in their time on the big stage

Ashish Pant20-May-2024Rohit Paudel was 11 when Nepal last qualified for a T20 World Cup. He distinctly remembers running back from school to watch the side make history by qualifying for the tournament. On match days during the World Cup, the entire neighbourhood would get together and watch Nepal’s World Cup games, he says.Seeing the likes of Paras Khadka and Gyanendra Malla overcome odds to represent Nepal at a major world event captured Paudel’s imagination. He set his sights on becoming a professional cricketer, hoping to play in a World Cup someday like his heroes.Ten years later he is not just representing Nepal, he is the captain of the team that embarks on just its second T20 World Cup appearance since that 2014 tournament in Bangladesh.Related

  • Kathmandu or Dallas? Nepal's fans are showing their strength at the T20 World Cup

  • Make Nepal cricket great: the Paras Khadka story

  • Nepal smash records with fastest century and fifty in men's T20Is

  • Nepal show they are worthy of more opportunities at this level

  • Nepal climbs a mountain (2014)

Growing up in Buddhabasti, a village in Lumbini Province about 200km west of Kathmandu, Paudel was introduced to the sport by his older brother. Cricket has always been popular in Nepal, but the lack of adequate infrastructure meant it wasn’t always a viable option professionally. The 2014 T20 World Cup, however, changed things for Paudel. He wanted to become a cricketer and play for his country at the highest level.It wasn’t easy. There weren’t many professional coaches and academies where he lived. So when he was barely in his teens, Paudel was off to Kathmandu to enrol at the Baluwatar cricket academy there.”Initially it was tough, very tough,” Paudel says about having to go live with his older sister in the capital. “Leaving your mother behind isn’t easy, no? Right from the start I have always stayed with her. Slowly I adjusted.”His rise up the ranks was swift. Paudel made his ODI debut when he was a month shy of his 16th birthday, and in just his third game became the youngest player in men’s cricket to score a half-century in ODIs, a record that was eclipsed by his team-mate Kushal Malla a year later. Soon after, he got his T20I cap, and then in November 2022, barely two months after his 20th birthday, Paudel became Nepal’s ODI captain, the second youngest ever in ODI history, behind Rashid Khan.The passion factor: crowds turned up in droves, even climbing trees outside the perimeter, for the games against West Indies A in Nepal in April•Subash Shrestha/Getty ImagesIt did not come in the prettiest of circumstances. Paudel replaced Sandeep Lamichhane, who was suspended by the Cricket Association of Nepal (CAN) and later sentenced to jail for rape. Also, between August 2021 and December 2022, three Nepal coaches – Dav Whatmore, Pubudu Dassanayake and Manoj Prabhakar – resigned from their positions.At the start of 2023, the team was languishing in sixth place out of seven on the World Cup League 2 points table. Only the top three teams could make a straight entry into the ODI World Cup qualifiers later in the year. But the bigger worry was that only the top five teams at the end of the league would be able to retain ODI status. Nepal were on the brink of losing that.They needed some inspiration and it came through two appointments that shouldn’t have been needed in the first place. Paudel was handed the captaincy because of Lamichhane’s suspension. In February 2023, Monty Desai was named the Nepal head coach, replacing Prabhakar, who resigned after only five months in the job.You might say scaling improbable summits is second nature for Nepalis, but even the most ardent fans cannot have foreseen the unprecedented rise that followed. Desai’s experience of working with several international teams, and Paudel’s brand of courageous captaincy, helped bring about a dramatic upswing in Nepal’s fortunes.In the next 12 months or so, Nepal retained their ODI status, made it to the World Cup qualifiers, won 11 out of their last 12 games in World Cup League 2, and became the first ever team to breach the 300 mark in T20Is. To round off a remarkable year, they qualified for their first T20 World Cup in a decade, in front of a boisterous home crowd.Coach Monty Desai during his time with West Indies as their batting coach. “[Nepal] keep saying that pressure is privilege,” he says of the upcoming World Cup. “If we can handle that pressure well, then probably we’ll be scripting a new story as well”•Matthew Lewis/ICC/Getty ImagesPlaced in Group A of the Asia Qualifier alongside Oman, Singapore and Malaysia, they finished the league phase second on the points table with two wins out of three. In the semi-final they defeated UAE by eight wickets to cause bedlam in Mulpani.What brought about the turnaround? Desai puts it down to Paudel’s effective leadership and “one big, happy dressing room”.”When we started off this journey, what set him apart was that he was so clearly and quickly aligned with our vision,” Desai says of Paudel’s captaincy. “He is someone who has a lot of enthusiasm – very energetic, very curious. He has an understanding of this vision about Nepal cricket and is hungry. He wants to lead, he wants to influence his team-mates, and he wants to leave a mark. And that is something which has set him apart in my eyes.”He is a young captain but he has earned a lot of respect on and off the field because of the consistency which he brings in his behaviour. There is an element of calmness in him. He is a very well-balanced personality.”While Paudel the captain has grown, Paudel the batter has excelled too. Since April 2023, no other Nepal player has scored more runs in T20Is than Paudel’s 732 in 27 innings at an average of 36.60. He is also heading into the World Cup in prime form, having been the top run-scorer in a T20 series against a touring West Indies A side that included the likes of Obed McCoy, Matthew Forde and Hayden Walsh in their ranks. In four innings Paudel finished with 265 runs at 132.50. And while Nepal lost the series 2-3, the result could well have been in their favour had a few things gone their way.Veteran Nepal bowler (and lower-order hitter) Karan KC during the Asia Cup game against India last year•Pankaj Nangia/Getty Images”I think I am in very good form, in a much better space now,” Paudel says. “My focus is on the process. The World Cup will be watched by so many countries, and the focus will be on presenting my skills”The time in between two balls, I am trying to utilise that. And I am focusing on every ball. That, I think, is working for me. The one-ball battles. That is something I am keenly working on, and I want to keep working on that in the World Cup.”Another key figure in the 15-member squad, who has made quite a splash in these last 15 months is Dipendra Singh Airee, Nepal’s six-hitting machine. Against Mongolia in the Asian Games last year, he smashed a nine-ball fifty, the fastest ever in T20 history. In April this year he became just the third man to hit six sixes in an over in a T20I, against Qatar. His blitzes also fetched Airee a contract in the ILT20 last season as a replacement player for Gulf Giants.”What he brings in, the enthusiasm and the energy which he brings in on the field, it’s amazing to watch,” Desai says of him. “He never doubts his abilities.”It’s not fair to compare great cricketers around the world. But, you know, in an excitement of imagination, if I have to say it, he is in his own ways the [MS] Dhoni of Nepal. And I know from him that he has admired Dhoni for years. He wants to be like him. He says he wants to be known as a finisher.”He has not come across, up till now, a lot of superior skills, so we need to still see [how he fares against] that. But whatever he has faced so far, in that definitely he has got an attitude of going in the last few overs. If he knows there is a weak link there, then he looks for the big over with those weak links, which is very similar to any professional players around in the world who are playing in T20 leagues.”Six-hitter extraordinaire Dipendra Singh Airee (second from left) is Nepal’s MS Dhoni clone•Alex Davidson/ICC/Getty ImagesAnother aspect of Airee’s abilities, which both Paudel and Desai want the world to see more of, is his fielding. Paudel thinks Airee is at the moment “one of the best fielders in the world of our generation”, and Desai agrees. They might not be wrong.”The angles from where he gets run-outs… He is just oozing with confidence always,” Desai says. “We are learning new coaching methods from him.”To give an example – we know there are the right mechanics and the right elements to create throws and power. But he says, ‘What if I’m imbalanced and I have to throw an accurate throw?’ So he trains with an imbalanced position to throw. He throws with his right hand. He’s practising throwing with his non-throwing arm as well.”An imbalanced way of throwing is something creative. And he’s brought this method. So, very interesting.”Desai wants Nepal to give special attention to their fielding, at the T20 World Cup. “Our fielding unit is where we have been working a lot more, because we definitely have defined fielding as our sixth bowler who will get us a wicket,” he says.Nepal are one of the youngest teams in the competition. Of the 15 going to the World Cup, only four players are 26 or older, of whom only Karan KC is over 30. But that doesn’t mean they lack experience. Rohit, Airee and Karan have all played 100 or more international games, while openers Aasif Sheikh and Kushal Bhurtel also have a good amount of experience at the highest level. Even 20-year-old Kushal Malla has 75 international games under his belt. And for inspiration, Nepal don’t have to look past Sompal Kami, the only player in the side now who was part of the 2014 T20 World Cup squad, who is still only 28.Openers Kushal Bhurtel and Aasif Sheikh have 188 internationals under their belts collectively•ICC/Getty Images”We will give credit to the management and previous captains and coaches who have invested in players like Rohit and Dipendra, and Kushal Bhurtel and Aasif Sheikh. These are players who have played a lot of games. And I think these are the players that we as a team look forward to,” Desai says. “The others chip in and bring in their abilities.”So we have kind of picked the core group, where at least seven-odd players have played together a lot.”Placed in Group D, Nepal start their World Cup campaign against Netherlands on June 4 in Dallas, and will then face Sri Lanka, South Africa and Bangladesh. Paudel and Desai are not looking too far ahead. While the target certainly is to reach the Super Eights, they want to focus on the one-ball battles, take every moment as it comes, and be “fierce competitors”.”The first step in progress for us will be to win the first game,” Desai says. “We keep saying over here that pressure is privilege. If we can handle that pressure well, then probably we’ll be scripting a new story as well.”At the World Cup, all 20 teams start from the same point. In the Olympics, in 100-metre sprints, it’s the same for all athletes. Who crosses the line first is unknown.”Preparation-wise, there are expectations because of the recent results against the West Indies A team. For us, I would say my personal expectation as a coach with this team will be that I want them to stay connected with their identity, which is fierce competitors, and I want them to compete.Karan KC and Rohit Paudel after Nepal’s win against Scotland in a World Cricket League 2 game in Kirtipur in February 2023•Prakash Mathema/AFP/Getty Images”I keep reminding them that you have to respect these opportunities, because once their brand of cricket is recognised around the world, just the way some of the A teams have happily accepted our invitations and come to this country and played, that is how we will get more exposure, that is how we will grow and that is how our team will develop.Are there nerves within the camp?”I am not feeling the nervousness at the moment because there is still [some time] to go,” Paudel says. “But when I am outside, the fans do constantly remind us that there is a World Cup coming up. Then, yeah, we do feel some nervousness. But having said that, it is a great opportunity for all of us to play better cricket and take Nepal cricket to greater heights. We want to give the fans a gift by winning.”Nepal’s rise in world cricket hasn’t gone unnoticed. Just this year, they’ve had Namibia and Netherlands coming over for a T20I tri-series, alongside visits from Ireland A and West Indies A. Last month, Nepal also travelled to Vapi in Gujarat, India, for a preparatory camp, where they played a triangular series with Gujarat and Baroda.The last year and a half has been nothing short of a dream for Nepal. Now that they are at the World Cup, they will want to show the rest of the world that they belong. Who knows, maybe along the way they can also conjure a few miracles.

Sarah Glenn steps up as England look to shed reliance on big names

With eight wickets in the T20I series, Glenn is the joint-leading wicket-taker with fellow spinner Sophie Ecclestone

Valkerie Baynes14-Jul-20240:54

Glenn: We’ve shifted to a resilient, aggressive style without forcing it

It seems whenever the England men’s football team play a big match, Sarah Glenn brings her A game.In England Women’s opening T20I against New Zealand, the footballers were about half an hour into their Euro 2024 clash with Switzerland – which England won on penalties to reach the semi-final – when Glenn walked off the field at Southampton with a crucial 3 for 16 to her name as the hosts went 1-0 up in the five-match series.On Saturday, some 24 hours before England face Spain in the Euro final, she sat in the post-match press conference at The Oval with 4 for 19 from yet another victory over New Zealand, who go into Wednesday’s fixture at Lord’s with one last chance to return home with a solitary win from eight matches.Glenn is the joint-leading wicket-taker in the T20I leg of New Zealand’s visit with fellow England spinner Sophie Ecclestone. Glenn has eight wickets at a better average of 6.87, and her economy rate of 4.34 is the best across both teams. Charlie Dean, the other prong to England’s enviable spin trio, was rested on Saturday as part of her side’s rotation policy throughout this series, but Glenn and Ecclestone – six of New Zealand’s eight wickets fell between them – had it covered.Ecclestone and Glenn are ranked No. 1 and No. 2, respectively, in the ICC’s T20I bowling rankings and Dean is at No. 8. Ecclestone has held the top spot since February 2020 but England now find themselves in a position where they have enough players in form with bat and ball to experiment ahead of the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh in October.That is a testament to the depth they have been building, which appears to be peaking at the right time. It was only in May, after two home white-ball series against Pakistan that ended in victory for England but lacked the ruthlessness they have shown against New Zealand, that England head coach Jon Lewis suggested his squad faced a challenge keeping up with the standards of big stars Ecclestone and Nat Sciver-Brunt.Suzie Bates leaves the field after being bowled by Sophie Ecclestone on Saturday•Getty Images”Everyone’s performing at some point,” Glenn said. “I feel like we’re not kind of relying on big names anymore. Everyone has taken their turn to step up and I think that’s so exciting, especially the young ones and every single player. You could pick any XI at the moment, from not just this squad but also back into the regional teams. Everyone’s performing really, really well and pushing for their place. It’s really exciting.”New Zealand’s reliance on big names – Suzie Bates, Sophie Devine and Amelia Kerr – has left them looking toothless on this tour. That was emphasised by the fact that the closest they have got to beating England was when Devine reached a first half-century for any of those three in the T20Is with 58 in the third game in Canterbury. There, England won by six wickets with just four balls remaining after Alice Capsey’s 67 not out.In both of Glenn’s pivotal performances, she has claimed wickets in clusters. She took three in an over in Southampton and had two double-wicket overs on Saturday. She bowled Georgia Plimmer with a straight delivery that crashed into middle stump, then sent down a half-tracker that Amelia Kerr slapped straight to Capsey at midwicket, a dismissal Glenn admitted she would take but wasn’t keen to see on replay.Glenn also bowled Jess Kerr and had Maddy Green caught at mid-on, the latter saying: “They’re a world-class spin attack and Sarah has been able to come in and change the game. Unfortunately, we haven’t played it very well. She’s bowling well and we need to be at our best to compete with the likes of Sarah Glenn and their spin attack. We just weren’t at that today unfortunately and that sort of swung the momentum of our innings pretty crucially.”Against the backdrop of a football game that will grip the country on Sunday night, Glenn was asked how she prepares for big occasions.”I think it’s just that balance of switching on and switching off,” she said. “We set meetings to chat through fields or certain batters on their team, for example, so we put those in place just to have those chats and clear our heads before the game. And then in between that, switch off. We’re in the changeroom, got the tunes on, chatting a lot of rubbish, to be honest. It’s just that real balance of being really clear on what we want to do before and giving ourselves the best chance to win, but also enjoying it and playing with a smile on our face.”For the record, Ecclestone is the dressing room DJ, and Glenn believes “it absolutely is” when asked, “Is it coming home?” That makes sense, given that the team bus has had “It’s coming home” written in lights above the windscreen, where the destination would normally show. Even though this series hasn’t produced a big-game occasion – despite a healthy crowd at The Oval playing their part – soon enough England will be preparing for just that, and hoping the destination is the same.

How T20 is making spinners bowl shorter and faster

Standardised pitches and attack-minded batters have had an impact on the slow bowlers’ approach

Himanish Ganjoo and Sidharth Monga30-Aug-2024When Kuldeep Yadav burst onto the international scene in 2017, apart from the fact that he was one of very few international bowlers of left-arm wristspin, his slowness made him even more difficult to hit.Within two years, though, he was struggling to hold his place down in his IPL side, and his ODI numbers had started to suffer. The period from 2019 to 2021, during which he lost his place in his IPL side, was horrible for him.Kuldeep changed a lot in his technique to make a stellar comeback to limited-overs cricket, but the headline difference was increased pace while still putting similar action on the ball. Partly because of this, he isn’t turning the ball as much as before but is giving batters less time to adjust to any grip or movement off the pitch. The increase in speed has more than compensated for the slight reduction in turn, and he has become one of the best spinners in the world again.

To varying extents, with perhaps not as much visible change, that has largely been the story for all spinners. When Rahul Chahar was selected ahead of Yuzvendra Chahal for the T20 World Cup in the UAE, the reason, the instinct, was pace. From around 2020 onwards, pace became the buzzword to qualify spin. It bears itself out in the numbers.

This is mainly a reaction to being under attack. From once an over in 2017, batters are attempting boundaries once every four balls of spin now. In the face of this increased aggression, the spinner’s increase in pace aims at reducing the time a batter has to step down the track or use the crease to attack the ball.This change is complemented by a change in the lengths the spinners bowl. The region of the pitch four to five metres from the stumps is the traditional Test match good length: pitching the ball there draws the batter forward and induces mistakes but leaves enough distance for the ball to turn. The five-to-six-metre length is the “defensive” good length, where the ball pitches far away from the batter’s arc and bounces to the top of the stumps. This makes attacking hitting difficult – thus making this length defensive.

The set of three graphs below shows the change within the percentage of the three length bins within the 4-7m category over the years in the IPL. It is clear that the defensive option has started to dominate, even as spinners have consistently moved away from the batter’s hitting arc by bowling fewer balls in the 4-5m length. Even if we allow a metre’s room for error, the spinners are now aiming more at the 5-7m band than 4-6m.

This is not happening in a vacuum. Given a choice, spinners will love to bowl for more wickets, but there is a combination of factors at play that has not left them an option. Pitches have continued to become flatter, batters have continued to become bolder, and in the IPL the Impact Player has added further freedom to the batting approach. The year 2020 was something of an anomaly in this regard. That was when the IPL went to the UAE, where, in Sharjah, the ball gripped more than in India, and the other two venues had relatively big boundaries. The same happened during the T20 World Cup in 2024. When there was something in the pitches, Kuldeep’s average pace dropped to 84.5kmph.The conditions in the IPL in India provide a perfect storm for batters: flat pitches that become quicker and more skiddy under lights, and small boundaries. In this context, it is a borderline back-handed compliment to the groundsmen to say that they have perfected the art of making pitches that offer neither grip nor low bounce. The spinners need one element of assistance: either some grip to draw big mishits, or for the boundaries to be big enough to hurt batters on a normal mishit. They get neither, so they are forced to go defensive.Related

Deception by dip: the T20 spinner's invisible weapon

Kuldeep: Everyone told me to bowl quicker, but no one told me how

Faster, straighter, deadlier – Kuldeep 2.0 is India's ace in the hole

What makes legspin effective in limited-overs cricket? (2018)

Drift, swing, cramp: how fingerspinners are making a mark (2021)

Now if the spinners do bowl these defensive lengths at slower paces, the ball sits up for the batters to rock back and hit. Over the years the back-foot power game against spin has only improved. More batters are beginning to play the Heinrich Klaasen-like vertical pull efficiently.If spinners go fuller with pitches not offering them anything, they leave themselves open to what is known in Indian cricket as a “step hit”, where a batter plants their front foot down and takes you downtown – a spinner’s worst failure. You have to at least make them leave their crease, or sweep, if they are going to attack. With the margin for error so low, though, shorter without getting pulled seems to be the way to go.The graphic below shows the batting strike rate by year in the IPL for three length ranges. It is apparent that the shorter lengths are ideal when you’re looking to restrict run-scoring. The 4-5m length, especially, was blown away in the 2024 season, which produced significantly flatter surfaces than in previous years.

The final graphic shows the batting strike rates for different speed and length ranges in the last three seasons of the IPL. It reveals the interplay of speed and length that is crucial to thwarting batters in advanced T20 cricket with flatter pitches and belligerent batting. When going shortish (5-6m), it’s beneficial to bowl quicker to restrict batters from going back and hitting. When going fuller, bowling quick is detrimental, as it reduces the amount of deviation off the pitch; the 4-5m length works best, if at all, combined with low speeds. This full and slow option has been masterfully used by the likes of Chahal, but the possibilities for it are shrinking with shorter boundaries and placid pitches.

The 5-6m length remains the optimal restrictive option regardless of speed. In the early days of T20, many observers said spinners were doomed. Spinners triumphed – many with their slowness – to make their mark, but the modern trend of standardised, “easy” surfaces is squeezing them into the Goldilocks zone of the 5-7m length. The thing about bowlers is that they often find a way to stay relevant in the sport. This journey of adaptation is never complete and will continue to fascinate.

From wanting it, to not: the curious case of Steven Smith's opening career

There is also the intriguing question of what would have happened if the selectors had said no from the start

Alex Malcolm16-Oct-20241:36

What’s the logic of moving Smith back down the order?

George Bailey was very careful with his words when he revealed that Steven Smith would no longer be opening the batting in Australia’s Test team.”Steve had expressed a desire to move back down from that opening position,” Australia’s chair of selectors said on Monday before stating that captain Pat Cummins and coach Andrew McDonald had confirmed that Smith would be moving. Bailey was explicit too in noting that he, despite being the chair, did not decide the order.Smith’s dalliance with opening in Test cricket has been mostly criticised and there are a lot of people who believe it never should have happened.Related

  • Australia's opening gamble: Is Sam Konstas ready for Test cricket?

  • Australia's selection race: who is in the running to face India?

  • Sam Konstas vaults into Australia A squad after twin hundreds

  • Steven Smith's Test opening stint over with middle-order return for India

  • Australia quicks' unbroken summer could be an 'outlier'

And that is a thread worth pulling on. What if it never did happen?The intriguing part is not the question of who would have opened instead of Smith, which is fascinating but now a moot point. The intriguing part is what would have happened to Smith if the selectors had said no to his request to open the batting.This is where Bailey’s words are instructive. It has been lost somewhat that Smith drove the move. He requested to open the batting initially. He put it on the public agenda. The captain and coach both expressed their preference that Smith stay in No. 4 in the immediate days after Smith flagged his interest. Only after he confirmed his seriousness in undertaking the challenge did the team hierarchy conclude that it was worth doing to accommodate the selection of Cameron Green at No. 4 without forcing someone else to open against their wishes.There will be plenty of people who will say the decision-makers abdicated their responsibilities in that moment and that they should have told Smith it was a bad idea that wasn’t going to be entertained.That criticism is not unreasonable. Selectors, coaches and captains must make tough decisions and have tough conversations. But every decision has consequences and opportunity cost.Steven Smith wasn’t alone in find things tricky at the top•Getty ImagesSmith was hinting he was growing weary of the monotony of batting at No. 4. He has conquered every challenge there is in that role. His returns had been diminishing, albeit receding from a ridiculously high watermark. He had averaged 42.22 in the calendar year of 2023, and just 38.80 with a highest score of 50 in six innings against Pakistan prior to his move to the top of the order.It would take a brave and stubborn leader to hear one of Australia’s greatest ever Test batters request a fresh challenge and then flat out reject it when it was going to solve a selection headache.How would Smith have felt about that? There will be plenty who will argue that players should play the role they’re given rather than dictate terms. But if anyone has earned the right to at least request such a move, it is Smith.And given that he has been less than enthusiastic about shifting from No. 3 to No. 4 in Australia’s ODI team in recent times against his preference, the consequences of denying him the chance to open the batting in the Test team are worth considering. It is also worth noting his returns at No. 4 in the ODI side since the shift have been below his career record, coincidentally or otherwise.Had he remained at No. 4 in the Test side against West Indies and New Zealand there aren’t any guarantees he would have performed any differently than he did opening the batting. Would Australia have won in Brisbane had he been batting at No. 4, given he made an exceptional 91 not out in the chase as an opener? Would he have made a match-winning 174 not out at the Basin Reserve, as Green did? Could he have averaged more than 28.50? Those questions will never be answered. The added strands to Smith staying at No. 4, like how a different opener would have gone and what would have happened to Green, are also unanswerable.At least with Smith opening, he got a taste of what the alternate universe looks like and can potentially return to No. 4 with renewed vigour against India. Had he remained there, he may instead be feeling like Bill Murray’s character in Groundhog Day heading into this summer.That said, was the move as much of a failure as it has been made out to be?Smith’s average of 28.50 at the top across eight innings in those two Test series was not as bad as it appears on paper. His 91 not out was the highest score by any opener in the four Tests, with only three half-century scores registered by all the openers who played. Usman Khawaja averaged 32.42 in the same four games. Tom Latham averaged 31 in the two Tests in New Zealand but had two single figure scores in Wellington. Will Young, Kraigg Brathwaite and Tagenarine Chanderpaul all averaged single figures.There will be plenty of focus on whether Steven Smith can rekindle his best form against India•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesMarnus Labuschagne averaged 16.85 at No. 3 in those same four Tests, with a score of 90, while Kane Williamson averaged 19.25 at No. 3 in New Zealand with a half-century. The conditions were difficult.Smith’s returns were also on par with the career averages of the three main contenders to now take the role in Marcus Harris, Cameron Bancroft and Matt Renshaw, while David Warner averaged 30.12 across the final two years of his career.Beyond the numbers though, Smith’s initial move to open followed by his request to move back will have unintended consequences despite Green’s injury paving the way for an easy transition.The first of those falls on the team leadership when or if one of Harris, Bancroft or Renshaw gets the nod. All will feel pressure to prove themselves on Test match return in any case, but a nagging sense that they weren’t the first-choice option could be an added burden.A bolt from the blue like Sam Konstas would provide another twist. That would provide a clean, uncomplicated end to a slightly messy 11 months and signal a fresh start although depending on when Green is available again for Test cricket, another debate is on the cards.It will probably end up as a footnote on a storied career, but Smith’s time as a Test opener was a fascinating chapter.

Rohit Sharma and the sixes that woke up a dead game

A Test match that seemed certain to end up a draw now carries way more jeopardy thanks to the India captain

Alagappan Muthu30-Sep-20242:35

Manjrekar: ‘This is the legacy Rohit Sharma will leave as captain’

Test cricket has been around for so long that there are some things that simply can’t be known. Did Bradman sleep with his bat by his bedside? Did WG floss his teeth after brushing? Did Imran take a class on the psychology of cornered tigers? Did the Nawab of Pataudi have morning breath?The importance of a batter hitting the first two balls he faces for six sits somewhere in there, as a quirk. History, in as much as it could, suggests there have been four people to do so.Foffie Williams is known, even though it happened way back in 1948, because he was a fast bowler and it was very out of character. The rest of these marauders are of a more recent vintage and therefore data about them is much more readily available. Sachin Tendulkar took a liking to Nathan Lyon in 2013 and Umesh Yadav couldn’t resist George Linde in 2019. Each of these was an attack in the spur of the moment.On Monday, Rohit Sharma sashaying down the pitch to launch Khaled Ahmed straight down the ground and then swivelling on his back foot to pummel the next ball over square leg was deliberate.Related

  • Rohit hopes 'exceptional' series against Bangladesh doesn't go 'unnoticed'

  • Rohit Sharma's legacy: Rewiring his generation, encouraging the next

  • BCCI vice-president defends Kanpur as Test venue but concedes need for improvements

  • Stats – Rohit and Jaiswal give India speed-scoring records

  • India's breakneck pace keeps result alive after two lost days

“I don’t think as a bowling unit they [Bangladesh] expected that to happen. But it was always part of our game plan was to see, okay, how can we push this game forward? And how can we get the result?” bowling coach Morne Morkel said.India need five wins to feel safe about their place in the World Test Championship final next year. They have five Tests at home. Wrapping them up before heading to Australia would be a huge load off their shoulders. But the weather in Kanpur and the drainage at Green Park have been less than accommodating of those ideas. If India had dreamed of going Down Under and playing the Border-Gavaskar series all freed-up, they needed to do something drastic.And they did. Even before they began batting. With Rohit once more the instigator.Litton Das was playing some glorious punches either side of the wicket all while taking zero risks. So India’s captain pulled two of his slips out and planted them right in front of the batter. One at short midwicket, the other at silly mid-off. Now Litton couldn’t get his runs playing those check drives where his hands never strayed too far from his body. Now he had to do something different. He had to open himself up to risks.The one he took was trying to clear mid-off. And Rohit was there. He leapt up in the air. Reached one hand up into the sky and came down with the ball and a smile that needed way more space than he had available, a shortcoming fixed quickly enough when his team-mates joined him. His smile spread to them and their smiles spread to the 20,000 or so people who were watching at the stadium. Shubman Gill re-enacted the catch in the celebrations. Rohit re-enacted it himself when he returned to mid-on for the new batter. It was a moment’s fun that he allowed himself before getting back down to business.Bangladesh could scarcely have imagined the carnage heading their way. Most of it came off the bat of Yashasvi Jaiswal, who looked certain to become India’s fastest Test centurion. At various times, he had six times as many boundary riders (6) as catching fielders (1). And still he kept beating them, choosing often enough to go clean over their heads, but the more impressive shots were the ones along the ground. He somehow kept finding the gap, the sweep going finer of deep square leg, the cover drive scuttling away to the sweeper’s left, long-on staring as the ball thudded into the stands behind him.Rohit Sharma came out all guns blazing•BCCIThere was a moment when Shakib Al Hasan, fed up with what’s happening, tried to get his captain’s attention to suggest a field change but Najmul Hossain Shanto must have had too much on his mind to notice. In the end, Shakib just gave up and was forced to wait until the end of the over to convey his message.With Bangladesh scrambling, Jaiswal helped himself to 72 runs off 51 balls. Virat Kohli produced an innings where his control percentage was down in the mid-60s but his strike rate was up in the high 130s thanks to a willingness to try shots as exotic as the standing reverse dab to deep third. KL Rahul forgot to look like he’s going through an existential crisis every time he plays this format and scored a 33-ball fifty. India took the lead within three hours.”It was a collective buy-in from the batting group and that is important,” Morkel said. “From GG’s point of view as well, we decided let’s see if we can take the game forward as fast as possible and you need a leader from the front to do that. And Rohit has done it so many times for India and again today to go first ball, bang six, you know, on a surface where you think, is the bounce might be up and down, you’re not quite sure how the new ball is going to play, just to make his mark in that fashion…”India got to 50 in 18 balls, 100 in 61 balls, 200 in 148 balls and 250 in 183 balls. Each of them was a Test match record and a plan coming together. The vastness of our game (so much of it being unknown) and the weirdness of this one (so much of it lost to the wayside) collided when Rohit took strike.

Harry Brook proves how much he cares by playing as though he doesn't

Maiden ODI century proves an apt retort after criticism of his previous comments in defeat

Vithushan Ehantharajah24-Sep-2024A look to the heavens before a puff of the cheeks. A “fookin’ ‘ellll” exhaled out the side of his mouth. Harry Brook’s reaction in the 34th over of England’s chase said it all. Who cares? He does.The relief flowed after his maiden ODI century, a feeling you could apply more broadly to the last week, his central part in it and the situation his team faced at the Seat Unique Riverside. After two humbling defeats, England were well on their way to winning this third ODI in Durham. And a cricketer who perhaps did not realise how sapping ODI captaincy could be – “I was actually knackered when I got out there after 50 overs in the field,” he said at the end – finally got to experience being the lesser stressed of the two leaders.There are caveats of course, though nothing to do with rain taking the players off in the 38th over of England’s pursuit of 305. Brook and Liam Livingstone had begun munching through what was left, and the 51 left on the table was set to be devoured in about half of the 74 balls left. They were 46 ahead on DLS at the break in play.Australia rested Travis Head, which lent itself to a subdued start – they struck just nine boundaries in the first 25 overs – before a late flurry shifted their total to 304 for 7. Adam Zampa’s illness robbed them of an X-factor, with the full-time ‘part-time’ offspin of Glenn Maxwell and Matthew Short combining for three forgettable overs. A healthy amount of legspin would have broken up the monotony of seam that England managed easily through the middle overs as Brook and Will Jacks flourished having come together at 11 for 2. “It’s always a different team when Adam Zampa is not there,” Australia’s head coach Andrew McDonald said after the match.Brook also won his third consecutive toss, and though that hadn’t helped at Trent Bridge or Headingley, conditions at Chester-le-Street were conducive to bowling up top. But it turned out to be the first of several correct calls in what turned out to be an accomplished day out for the 25-year-old.Brook admitted he’d found his early experience of the captaincy a bit ‘frantic’•Getty ImagesBefore he starred with the bat, Brook showed a decent amount of cunning in the field. Perhaps the best of it was using an unusually narrow and close mid-on to remove Cameron Green, breaking a stand of 84 with Steven Smith, who was essentially shielding the fielder – Matthew Potts – at the non-striker’s end as Jacob Bethell twirled his left-arm orthodox from around the wicket.”There wasn’t much turn and Beth was kind of just sliding it on,” Brook explained of the unusual placing. Granted, Green did not need to charge down and slap the ball straight to Potts – which Brook acknowledged in his own way. “It was a little bit of luck, to be honest, I’m not going to take the credit too much. But that’s nice to see, when you do make a change and it works straight away.”Another tweak saw the back of Marnus Labuschagne for a duck. The Australian No.5, keen to get off the mark while being denied options down the ground, attempted to find relief with a scoop off Jacks. A ricochet off his grille gave Jamie Smith a simple catch behind the stumps.Despite some sound marshalling of the attack – particularly Brydon Carse, who bowled better than figures of 1 for 55 suggest – things did unravel for Brook at the end of Australia’s innings. Alex Carey’s acceleration and Aaron Hardie’s introduction saw 104 scored off the last 10 overs, with a startling 55 coming from the last four. England looked a seamer light – specifically, an allrounder, and it was some comfort when their most exalted of that breed spent the interval telling Sky he would be more than willing to return when he is inevitably asked.Winning helps of course, but Brook regarded this as an altogether more comfortable outing as captain. “Progressively it’s got more enjoyable. The first game I felt a little bit frantic, at times. But as the series has gone on, I’ve felt a lot more chilled.”It certainly looked that way as far as his batting was concerned. A devastating unbeaten 110 – three figures brought up in just 87 deliveries – breaks a 16-innings streak without a century across all formats, domestic and international. There have been just two half-centuries – for Northern Superchargers against Manchester Originals and in the first innings of the first Sri Lanka Test – since his fifth Test hundred against West Indies at Trent Bridge in the middle of July, among eight other double-figure scores.Related

No end in sight for Adil Rashid after passing the 200 wickets summit

Harry Brook 110* fires England chase to help keep series alive

Ben Stokes open to white-ball comeback as McCullum begins new England era

Could more crushing ODI failure be just what England need?

Carey takes his chance to silence hostile Headingley

There were some welcome hallmarks of the Brook that England fans have come to expect. He explained his success as a case of keeping his head “as still as possible”, watching the ball and playing it late – traits which, to be fair, were abundantly clear today. But there were also the characteristic impulsive streaks.The first time he used his feet was to carve Josh Hazlewood over backward point in the ninth over. He greeted the first deliveries of Maxwell and Short with lofted drives over extra cover, for four and six respectively.In Jacks, he had an ally willing to keep pace, and even sprint ahead. The pair tag-teamed Mitchell Starc in the 23rd over, handing the left-arm quick his third most expensive over in ODIs (19). By the time their stand was broken for 156 – Jacks slicing to point for 84 – the ask was a manageable 138 from 135 deliveries. Brook seemed intent to drive, cut and scoop his way through that figure, eventually having to make do with 40 of the 87 England hacked off before the rains came.”He’s an impressive player,” McDonald said. “He’s going to have a long career for England, and he’s going to give us some headaches along the journey.”You could call this a statement knock of sorts. Two-fold, perhaps. The first being that it gave Brook the chance to clarify comments made after the first ODI. “If you get caught somewhere on the boundary or in the field, then who cares?” was the utterance in question, leading to widespread derision from fans and pundits alike.”I think people took that a little bit the wrong way,” he said. “You’ve got to go out there and play fearlessly and almost have that ‘who cares’ attitude. That’s not a ‘who cares if we lose attitude’ – we still want to win. But you don’t want to go out there and have that fear of getting out.”You could see what he meant at the time, but Tuesday’s knock – studded with 13 fours and two sixes – acts as a handy guide to make it crystal clear. This was Brook leading from the front, in a familiar sweet spot of showing just how much he cares through not caring the right way.

WTC final scenarios – India need to beat Australia 4-0 to qualify on their own

India’s 3-0 defeat to New Zealand has opened up several possibilities for teams in their fight for a place in the WTC final

S Rajesh03-Nov-2024India
Three shocking defeats against New Zealand means India are now in real danger of missing out on the WTC final at Lord’s next June. To be certain of still finishing in the top two, India now need to beat Australia 4-0. Four wins and a draw will lift India’s points to 65.79%, which will be marginally more than New Zealand’s maximum (64.29%) if they blank England 3-0 at home. India will then be at worst second on the points table, after South Africa, who can finish on a maximum of 69.44% with 2-0 home wins against Sri Lanka and Pakistan.However, these scenarios are based on other teams maximising their points. If that doesn’t happen, India can still make it with far fewer points. Let’s assume these results happen from the key upcoming series:

  • India lose to Australia 2-3
  • New Zealand draw with England 1-1
  • South Africa draw 1-1 at home in both their remaining series
  • Australia draw 0-0 in Sri Lanka

If the above four series go as mentioned, then Australia will finish on top at 58.77%, but India’s 53.51% will still be enough for second place, ahead of South Africa (52.78%), New Zealand (52.38%) and Sri Lanka (51.28%). Thus, India don’t necessarily need four wins if other results go their way. However, it’s far more likely now that they will need help from other teams to finish among the top two.ESPNcricinfo LtdNew Zealand
At the start of the series in India, it seemed highly improbable that New Zealand would still be in contention for a place in the WTC final after the series. But three incredible wins have given them the chance to dream. If New Zealand win each of their three remaining Tests, against England at home, they will finish on 64.29%. It won’t ensure qualification, but it will certainly keep them in the mix. If New Zealand lose one of those Tests, though, their percentage will drop to 57.14%, which might still be enough depending on other results.South Africa
If South Africa win each of their four remaining Tests, they will finish with 69.44%, which will surely be enough for qualification, as only Australia can go past that number. Three wins and a draw will leave them with 63.89%, while three wins and a defeat will lower the percentage marginally to 61.11%, which could still give them a chance if other results go their way. South Africa have a favourable schedule too, with home Tests to come against Sri Lanka and Pakistan.Australia
India’s three defeats against New Zealand have improved Australia’s chances of making the WTC final. A 3-2 series win against India will keep Australia ahead of India even if they lose both Tests in Sri Lanka. But Australia will want to do better than that, as New Zealand and Sri Lanka are also in contention for a top-two finish. To ensure qualification without depending on other results, Australia need five wins from their seven remaining matches.Sri Lanka have four remaining Tests against two opponents who are also contenders for WTC final•AFP/Getty ImagesSri Lanka
With a full 36 points gained from their last three Tests, Sri Lanka have made a strong push towards a top-two finish in this WTC cycle. Their four remaining Tests are against two opponents who are also contenders for the final. If Sri Lanka win each of those matches and take home 48 more points, they will finish on 69.23% and assure themselves of a place in the final regardless of other results. If they lose one and win three, they will end up at 61.54%, which will still leave them with a chance of qualifying, but depending on other results.England
The two defeats in Pakistan means that England can finish with a maximum of 48.86% even if they beat New Zealand 3-0 in their last series of the current cycle. It’s almost certain that it won’t be enough for qualification, though there’s a mathematical chance of finishing second on 48.86 if several other results go their way: if India get no more than 13 points from their remaining games, with the upper limits being 18 and 16 respectively for South Africa and Sri Lanka, then England can still finish second to Australia.*Pakistan
Pakistan’s home form has shown some revival, but it’s most likely too late in this cycle. If they win each of their four remaining Tests, they will finish on 52.38%. They will need several results going their way to be in contention. If, for instance, Sri Lanka lose 0-1 in South Africa, and draw 1-1 against Australia; India lose 1-2 in Australia; and New Zealand lose 1-2 against England, then Pakistan’s 52.38% will be enough for a second place behind Australia.Bangladesh
Four defeats in their last four Tests, against India and South Africa, have hurt Bangladesh badly – from 45.83% at one stage, they have currently dropped to 27.50%. Even if they win each of their two remaining Tests, they will only improve to 39.58%, which won’t be enough for a place in the top two.West Indies
West Indies have already played four series, and have only scored 20 points out of 108. Even if they win their last four Tests, they can only finish on 43.59%.* Nov 3, 1600 GMT: The piece was edited to indicate that England still have a mathematical chance of finishing in the top two

Game
Register
Service
Bonus